Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22927525›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2012

Phase II trial of cetuximab with or without paclitaxel in patients with advanced urothelial tract carcinoma.

Yu-Ning Wong, Samuel Litwin, David Vaughn, Seth Cohen, Elizabeth R Plimack, James Lee, Wei Song, Michael Dabrow, Marion Brody, Holly Tuttle and 1 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00350025 (Randomized Phase II Trial of Cetuximab With and Without Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00350025 phase2completednot on this map

Randomized Phase II Trial of Cetuximab With and Without Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorFox Chase Cancer CenterRan2006 to 2012Enrolled41ConditionsUrologic NeoplasmArmsCetuximab, Paclitaxel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Landscape of targeted therapies for advanced urothelial carcinoma.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The miRNome of canine invasive urothelial carcinoma.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Novel Tyrosine Kinase Targets in Urothelial Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu-Ning WongUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Samuel Litwin
David Vaughn
Seth Cohen
Elizabeth R Plimack
James Lee
Wei Song
Michael Dabrow
Marion Brody
Holly Tuttle
Gary Hudes
Fox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI CHARNITA M. ZEIGLER-JOHNSON · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P30CA06927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe benefit of salvage chemotherapy is modest in metastatic urothelial cancer. We conducted a randomized, noncomparative phase II study to measure the efficacy of cetuximab with or without paclitaxel in patients with previously treated urothelial cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with metastatic urothelial cancer who received one line of chemotherapy in the perioperative or metastatic setting were randomly assigned to 4-week cycles of cetuximab 250 mg/m(2) with or without paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) per week. We used early progression as an indicator of futility. Either arm would close if seven of the initial 15 patients in that arm progressed at the first disease evaluation at 8 weeks.

resultsWe enrolled 39 evaluable patients. The single-agent cetuximab arm closed after nine of the first 11 patients progressed by 8 weeks. The combination arm completed the full accrual of 28 patients, of whom 22 patients (78.5%) had visceral disease. Twelve of 28 patients had progression-free survival greater than 16 weeks. The overall response rate was 25% (95% CI, 11% to 45%; three complete responses and four partial responses). The median progression-free survival was 16.4 weeks (95% CI, 12 to 25.1 weeks), and the median overall survival was 42 weeks (95% CI, 30.4 to 78 weeks). Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events that occurred in at least two patients were rash (six cases), fatigue (five cases), and low magnesium (three cases).

conclusionAlthough it had limited activity as a single agent, cetuximab appears to augment the antitumor activity of paclitaxel in previously treated urothelial cancers. The cetuximab and paclitaxel combination merits additional study to establish its role in the treatment of urothelial cancers.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Transitional CellCetuximabDisease-Free SurvivalErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximabErbB ReceptorsPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID22927525
PMCPMC3454772
OpenAlexW2154673624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.