Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22927416›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Predictive computation of genomic logic processing functions in embryonic development.

Isabelle S Peter, Emmanuel Faure, Eric H Davidson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Transcriptional network dynamics in early T cell development.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tempos and modes of collectivity in the history of life.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dynamic Modeling of Transcriptional Gene Regulatory Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Genetics in Light of Transcriptional Adaptation.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2020
    Review

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabelle S PeterDivision of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. ipeter@caltech.edu
Emmanuel Faure
Eric H Davidson

Funding

Transcriptional Casualty in Embryonic Morphogenesis: from the Specifications GRNP01HD037105 · NICHD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DAVIDSON, ERIC H · 1999 to 2018
$27.1M
COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF GENE REGULATORY PROGRAMR01GM061005 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DAVIDSON, ERIC H · 2000 to 2011
$4.5M
NICHD NIH HHS HD 037105NICHD NIH HHS HD 0656016ANICHD NIH HHS P01 HD037105NIGMS NIH HHS GM 061005NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) control the dynamic spatial patterns of regulatory gene expression in development. Thus, in principle, GRN models may provide system-level, causal explanations of developmental process. To test this assertion, we have transformed a relatively well-established GRN model into a predictive, dynamic Boolean computational model. This Boolean model computes spatial and temporal gene expression according to the regulatory logic and gene interactions specified in a GRN model for embryonic development in the sea urchin. Additional information input into the model included the progressive embryonic geometry and gene expression kinetics. The resulting model predicted gene expression patterns for a large number of individual regulatory genes each hour up to gastrulation (30 h) in four different spatial domains of the embryo. Direct comparison with experimental observations showed that the model predictively computed these patterns with remarkable spatial and temporal accuracy. In addition, we used this model to carry out in silico perturbations of regulatory functions and of embryonic spatial organization. The model computationally reproduced the altered developmental functions observed experimentally. Two major conclusions are that the starting GRN model contains sufficiently complete regulatory information to permit explanation of a complex developmental process of gene expression solely in terms of genomic regulatory code, and that the Boolean model provides a tool with which to test in silico regulatory circuitry and developmental perturbations.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsComputational BiologyEmbryo, MammalianEmbryo, NonmammalianHumansModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID22927416
PMCPMC3478651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.