Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22927372›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Escape from Adaptive Conflict follows from weak functional trade-offs and mutational robustness.

Tobias Sikosek, Hue Sun Chan, Erich Bornberg-Bauer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genome of venomous caterpillarProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanisms of protein evolution.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The evolution of metabolism: How to test evolutionary hypotheses at the genomic level.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Foldamer hypothesis for the growth and sequence differentiation of prebiotic polymers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Evolution of intrinsic disorder in eukaryotic proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tobias SikosekEvolutionary Bioinformatics Group, Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstraße 1, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Hue Sun Chan
Erich Bornberg-Bauer
University of Münster · DEUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-84281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental question in molecular evolution is how proteins can adapt to new functions while being conserved for an existing function at the same time. Several theoretical models have been put forward to explain this apparent paradox. The most popular models include neofunctionalization, subfunctionalization (SUBF) by degenerative mutations, and dosage models. All of these models focus on adaptation after gene duplication. A newly proposed model named "Escape from Adaptive Conflict" (EAC) includes adaptive processes before and after gene duplication that lead to multifunctional proteins, and divergence (SUBF). Support for the importance of multifunctionality for the evolution of new protein functions comes from two experimental observations. First, many enzymes have highly evolvable promiscuous side activities. Second, different structural states of the same protein can be associated with different functions. How these observations may be related to the EAC model, under which conditions EAC is possible, and how the different models relate to each other is still unclear. Here, we present a theoretical framework that uses biophysical principles to infer the roles of functional promiscuity, gene dosage, gene duplication, point mutations, and selection pressures in the evolution of proteins. We find that selection pressures can determine whether neofunctionalization or SUBF is the more likely evolutionary process. Multifunctional proteins, arising during EAC evolution, allow rapid adaptation independent of gene duplication. This becomes a crucial advantage when gene duplications are rare. Finally, we propose that an increase in mutational robustness, not necessarily functional optimization, can be the sole driving force behind SUBF.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, BiologicalAdaptation, BiologicalComputer SimulationGene DuplicationGenetic FitnessMutationProteinsSelection, GeneticProteins

Identifiers

PMID22927372
PMCPMC3443171
OpenAlexW2141846102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.