Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22926706›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pathology2012

A robust genomic signature for the detection of colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability phenotype and high mutation frequency.

Sun Tian, Paul Roepman, Vlad Popovici, Magali Michaut, Ian Majewski, Ramon Salazar, Cristina Santos, Robert Rosenberg, Ulrich Nitsche, Wilma E Mesker and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pathology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Global Pattern of CD8Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  10. In-depth Clinical and Biological Exploration of DNA Damage Immune Response as a Biomarker for Oxaliplatin Use in Colorectal Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Patient-Derived Xenografts and Matched Cell Lines Identify Pharmacogenomic Vulnerabilities in Colorectal Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Sun TianAgendia NV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Agendia Inc., Irvine, CA, USA.
Paul Roepman
Vlad Popovici
Magali Michaut
Ian Majewski
Ramon Salazar
Cristina Santos
Robert Rosenberg
Ulrich Nitsche
Wilma E Mesker
Sjoerd Bruin
Sabine Tejpar
Mauro Delorenzi
Rene Bernards
Iris Simon
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAgendia (Netherlands) · NLInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHTUM Klinikum · DEKU Leuven · BELeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) occurs in 10-20% of colorectal tumours and is associated with good prognosis. Here we describe the development and validation of a genomic signature that identifies colorectal cancer patients with MSI caused by DNA mismatch repair deficiency with high accuracy. Microsatellite status for 276 stage II and III colorectal tumours has been determined. Full-genome expression data was used to identify genes that correlate with MSI status. A subset of these samples (n = 73) had sequencing data for 615 genes available. An MSI gene signature of 64 genes was developed and validated in two independent validation sets: the first consisting of frozen samples from 132 stage II patients; and the second consisting of FFPE samples from the PETACC-3 trial (n = 625). The 64-gene MSI signature identified MSI patients in the first validation set with a sensitivity of 90.3% and an overall accuracy of 84.8%, with an AUC of 0.942 (95% CI, 0.888-0.975). In the second validation, the signature also showed excellent performance, with a sensitivity 94.3% and an overall accuracy of 90.6%, with an AUC of 0.965 (95% CI, 0.943-0.988). Besides correct identification of MSI patients, the gene signature identified a group of MSI-like patients that were MSS by standard assessment but MSI by signature assessment. The MSI-signature could be linked to a deficient MMR phenotype, as both MSI and MSI-like patients showed a high mutation frequency (8.2% and 6.4% of 615 genes assayed, respectively) as compared to patients classified as MSS (1.6% mutation frequency). The MSI signature showed prognostic power in stage II patients (n = 215) with a hazard ratio of 0.252 (p = 0.0145). Patients with an MSI-like phenotype had also an improved survival when compared to MSS patients. The MSI signature was translated to a diagnostic microarray and technically and clinically validated in FFPE and frozen samples.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsMicrosatellite InstabilityAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMaleMutation RatePhenotypePrognosisColorectal cancerdeficient mismatch repair systemgene expressiongenomic signaturemicrosatellite instabilitymutation frequencyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID22926706
PMCPMC3532622
OpenAlexW1496141235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.