ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2013
Single-radius, multidirectional total knee replacement.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty with single-radius versus multi-radius posterior-stabilized prostheses.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2019Trial
- Lateral distal femoral condyle has more uniform cartilage wear in varus knee osteoarthritis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- No difference in 13-year survival after medial pivot or central pivot mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. A propensity matched comparative analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Article
- Comparison of functional outcomes between single-radius and multi-radius femoral components in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Knee surgery & related research · 2020Review
- Better quadriceps and hamstring strength is achieved after Total knee Arthroplasty with single radius femoral prostheses: a retrospective study based on isokinetic and isometric data.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2020Article
- Radiographic measurement of the posterior femoral offset is not precise.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017Article
- No differences in functional results and quality of life after single-radius or multiradius TKA.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016Article
- Is Single-Radius Design Better for Quadriceps Recovery in Total Knee Arthroplasty?Knee surgery & related research · 2015Article
- Differences in anatomy and kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA patients: influence on implant positioning and subsequent loading conditions in mobile bearing knees.BioMed research international · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe present study was designed to evaluate the mid-term (5- to 8-year) survival rate of a new total knee replacement (TKR) with a single-radius femoral component and a multidirectional, highly congruent tibial component, in comparison with an historical group (TKR with multi-radius design and fixed bearing).
methodsFour hundred and thirty patients were included, of which 369 patients (86 %) completed the 5-year follow-up with Knee Society Score evaluation and radiograph examination (study group = 387, control group = 83).
resultsThere was a significant improvement for all analysed items between pre-operative status and late follow-up. Mean knee score was 93 ± 9 points in the study group and 88 ± 16 points in the control group (p < 0.001). Mean flexion angle was not different (118 ± 11 vs. 114 ± 13 degrees). Mean functional score was 87 ± 16 points in the study group and 71 ± 24 points in the control group (p < 0.001). Survival rate at 5-year follow-up was 98.8 % (vs. 98.0 %) for mechanical revisions only, and 96.4 % (vs. 98.1 %) for all revisions.
conclusionsThe new TKR allowed obtaining significantly better results than the fixed-bearing TKR. These results are in line with the best series published in the current literature, but there was no evidence of any superiority of this TKR against already published standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22926672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.