Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22926585›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2012

[Difficult extubation].

W Windisch, C Karagiannidis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W WindischAbt. Pneumologie-Lungenklinik Merheim, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, Köln, Germany. windischw@kliniken-koeln.de
C Karagiannidis
Kliniken der Stadt Köln · DELungenklinik Köln-Merheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal timing of extubation following intubation substantially impacts on the prognosis of intensive care unit (ICU) patients whereby both early extubation with the risk of reintubation and delayed extubation with prolongation of mechanical ventilation need to be avoided. In most cases extubation is easy; in some cases, however, extubation may be extremely difficult or even impossible with two major reasons being responsible for this: firstly, laryngeal edema, where the cuff leak test and steroid treatment are well established procedures aimed at diagnosing and treating potential laryngeal complications and secondly, the presence of (chronic) respiratory failure despite sufficient treatment of acute respiratory failure. This can result in post-extubation failure following extubation or weaning failure and noninvasive ventilation has been increasingly used in both scenarios. Currently, specialised weaning centres are being established and certified in Germany aimed at managing the complex tasks for patients with prolonged weaning.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationAlgorithmsCooperative BehaviorHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterdisciplinary CommunicationLaryngeal EdemaPatient Care TeamRespiratory InsufficiencyRisk FactorsTreatment FailureVentilator Weaning

Identifiers

PMID22926585
OpenAlexW111493531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.