Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22926437›Full record

ArticleGenes & nutrition2013

The contribution of transgenic plants to better health through improved nutrition: opportunities and constraints.

Eduard Pérez-Massot, Raviraj Banakar, Sonia Gómez-Galera, Uxue Zorrilla-López, Georgina Sanahuja, Gemma Arjó, Bruna Miralpeix, Evangelia Vamvaka, Gemma Farré, Sol Maiam Rivera and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A versatileFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Potato biofortification: an effective way to fight global hidden hunger.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Eduard Pérez-MassotDepartment of Plant Production and Forestry Science, ETSEA, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio Center, Av. Alcalde Rovira Roure, 191, 25198, Lleida, Spain.
Raviraj Banakar
Sonia Gómez-Galera
Uxue Zorrilla-López
Georgina Sanahuja
Gemma Arjó
Bruna Miralpeix
Evangelia Vamvaka
Gemma Farré
Sol Maiam Rivera
Svetlana Dashevskaya
Judit Berman
Maite Sabalza
Dawei Yuan
Chao Bai
Ludovic Bassie
Richard M Twyman
Teresa Capell
Paul Christou
Changfu Zhu

Funding

European Research Council 232933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malnutrition is a prevalent and entrenched global socioeconomic challenge that reflects the combined impact of poverty, poor access to food, inefficient food distribution infrastructure, and an over-reliance on subsistence mono-agriculture. The dependence on staple cereals lacking many essential nutrients means that malnutrition is endemic in developing countries. Most individuals lack diverse diets and are therefore exposed to nutrient deficiencies. Plant biotechnology could play a major role in combating malnutrition through the engineering of nutritionally enhanced crops. In this article, we discuss different approaches that can enhance the nutritional content of staple crops by genetic engineering (GE) as well as the functionality and safety assessments required before nutritionally enhanced GE crops can be deployed in the field. We also consider major constraints that hinder the adoption of GE technology at different levels and suggest policies that could be adopted to accelerate the deployment of nutritionally enhanced GE crops within a multicomponent strategy to combat malnutrition.

Identifiers

PMID22926437
PMCPMC3534993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.