Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22925010›Full record

ArticlePsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2013

Integrating brain and behavior: evaluating adolescents' response to a cannabis intervention.

Sarah W Feldstein Ewing, Amber D McEachern, Uma Yezhuvath, Angela D Bryan, Kent E Hutchison, Francesca M Filbey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The hyper-sentient addict: an exteroception model of addiction.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Cannabis abstinence during treatment and one-year follow-up: relationship to neural activity in men.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Trial
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Precuneus: A Key on the Road to Translation.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2019
    Article
  20. Hunting for What Works: Adolescents in Addiction Treatment.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah W Feldstein EwingUniversity Honors Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. swfeld@unm.edu
Amber D McEachern
Uma Yezhuvath
Angela D Bryan
Kent E Hutchison
Francesca M Filbey

Funding

Adolescent Response to Psychotherapy: The Role of Neuronal NetworksR03DA027892 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI FELDSTEIN EWING, SARAH W. · 2010 to 2010
$245k
NIDA NIH HHS 1R03DA027892-01NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA027892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Client language (change talk [CT] and counterchange talk [CCT]) is gaining increasing support as an active ingredient of psychosocial interventions. Preliminary work with adults suggests that there may be a neural basis for this. With a diverse sample of adolescent cannabis users, we evaluated the influence of CT and CCT on blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response during an fMRI cannabis cue-exposure paradigm. We also investigated how BOLD activation related to treatment outcomes. Adolescent cannabis users (N = 43; 83.7% male; 53.5% Hispanic; M age = 16 years) were presented with CT and CCT derived from their prescan intervention session during the fMRI paradigm. Additionally, BOLD activation during CT (vs. CCT) was tested as a predictor of 1-month follow-up cannabis use behavior (frequency of cannabis use, cannabis problems, cannabis dependence). We observed a significant interaction, with greater activation during CT (vs. CCT) during the cannabis (but not control) cues in several areas key to self-referential processes (uncorrected p < 0.001; medial frontal gyrus, insula). Furthermore, BOLD activation during CT (vs. CCT) during cannabis (but not control) cues in areas that underlie introspection (posterior cingulate, precuneus) was significantly related to youths' 1-month follow-up cannabis use behavior (frequency of cannabis use, cannabis problems, cannabis dependence; uncorrected p < 0.001). These data indicate a unique interaction pattern, whereby CT (vs. CCT) during the cannabis (but not control) cues was associated with significantly greater activation in brain areas involved in introspection. Further, this activation was related to significantly better treatment outcomes for youth.

Indexed as

CuesMotivational InterviewingSpeechAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAdultCerebral CortexFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMarijuana AbuseOxygenPatient Acceptance of Health CareOxygen

Identifiers

PMID22925010
PMCPMC6693491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.