Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22924886›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2012

Comparative study of one-step nucleic acid amplification assay, frozen section, and touch imprint cytology for intraoperative assessment of breast sentinel lymph node in Chinese patients.

Yong-sheng Wang, Tao Ou-yang, Jiong Wu, Yan-hui Liu, Xu-chen Cao, Xiao Sun, Li Fu, Ning Liao, Wen-tao Yang, Wei-xia Zhong and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03937414 (The Validation Study of the Intraoperative OSNA Molecular Assay), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03937414 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Validation Study of the Intraoperative OSNA Molecular Assay

TypeinterventionalSponsorShandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteRan2010 to 2020Enrolled1,500ConditionsSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyArmsThe OSNA assay
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. One-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA): where do we go with it?International journal of clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yong-sheng WangShandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, China. wangysh2008@yahoo.com.cn
Tao Ou-yang
Jiong Wu
Yan-hui Liu
Xu-chen Cao
Xiao Sun
Li Fu
Ning Liao
Wen-tao Yang
Wei-xia Zhong
Ai-ping Lu
Shandong Tumor Hospital · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNGuangdong General Hospital · CNPeking University · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledConventional procedures for the intraoperative assessment of breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are frozen section (FS) and touch imprint cytology (TIC). The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay is a novel molecular technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal approach by comparing OSNA assay, FS, and TIC. Five hundred and fifty-two consecutive patients were enroled from five study centers in China. The SLNs were cut into alternating 2 mm blocks. The odd blocks were tested by the OSNA assay intraoperatively, and the even ones were assessed by postoperative histology (four 4- to 6-μm-thick sections were taken every 200 μm per block). In addition, intraoperative histological assessments were carried out on the even blocks of 211 patients by FS and all blocks of 552 patients by TIC. Overall performance of the assay compared to postoperative histology was: accuracy 91.4%; sensitivity 83.7%; and specificity 92.9%. The sensitivity of the assay was higher than FS (211 patients, 77.6% vs 69.7%; not significant, P = 0.286) and was significantly higher than TIC (552 patients, 83.6% vs 76.2%; P = 0.044). When assessing nodes with micrometastases, the sensitivity of the assay was higher than FS (17 nodes, 47.1% vs 23.5%; not significant, P = 0.289) and was significantly higher than TIC (48 nodes, 62.5% vs 35.4%; P = 0.007). The study indicated that the OSNA assay is an accurate and rapid intraoperative assay for assessing breast SLNs and it can replace FS and TIC for application in general medical practice. The trial was registered as: OSNA assay China Registration Study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: China Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group 001c.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsian PeopleBreast NeoplasmsCytological TechniquesFemaleFrozen SectionsHumansIntraoperative PeriodLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID22924886
PMCPMC7659307
OpenAlexW2041956777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.