Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22924872›Full record

ReviewJournal of interprofessional care2012

Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: a literature review.

Erin Abu-Rish, Sara Kim, Lapio Choe, Lara Varpio, Elisabeth Malik, Andrew A White, Karen Craddick, Katherine Blondon, Lynne Robins, Pamela Nagasawa and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of interprofessional care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Erin Abu-RishSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. erin2@u.washington.edu
Sara Kim
Lapio Choe
Lara Varpio
Elisabeth Malik
Andrew A White
Karen Craddick
Katherine Blondon
Lynne Robins
Pamela Nagasawa
Allison Thigpen
Lee-Ling Chen
Joanne Rich
Brenda Zierler

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002318 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Megan Moore · 2017 to 2026
$8.4M
Institute for Translational Health Science (TL1)TL1RR025016 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2007 to 2011
$2.7M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesTL1TR000422 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000422NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002318NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR 025016NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR025016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a pressing need to redesign health professions education and integrate an interprofessional and systems approach into training. At the core of interprofessional education (IPE) are creating training synergies across healthcare professions and equipping learners with the collaborative skills required for today's complex healthcare environment. Educators are increasingly experimenting with new IPE models, but best practices for translating IPE into interprofessional practice and team-based care are not well defined. Our study explores current IPE models to identify emerging trends in strategies reported in published studies. We report key characteristics of 83 studies that report IPE activities between 2005 and 2010, including those utilizing qualitative, quantitative and mixed method research approaches. We found a wide array of IPE models and educational components. Although most studies reported outcomes in student learning about professional roles, team communication and general satisfaction with IPE activities, our review identified inconsistencies and shortcomings in how IPE activities are conceptualized, implemented, assessed and reported. Clearer specifications of minimal reporting requirements are useful for developing and testing IPE models that can inform and facilitate successful translation of IPE best practices into academic and clinical practice arenas.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationInterdisciplinary StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansModels, OrganizationalStudents, Health Occupations

Identifiers

PMID22924872
PMCPMC7594101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.