ArticleJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP2012
Etiopathogenesis of orofacial clefting revisited.
Article in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantification of Cytokines in Lip Tissue from Infants Affected by Congenital Cleft Lip and Palate.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Application of high-resolution array platform for genome-wide copy number variation analysis in patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2018Article
- 20p12.3 deletion is rare cause of syndromic cleft palate: case report and review of literature.BMC research notes · 2016Review
- The prevalence of developmental anomalies among school children in Southern district of Andhra Pradesh, India.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cleft anomaly may be more ancient than the man himself. It is one of the most common developmental malformations reported in the literature. There are number of intriguing theories regarding its etiopathogenesis, each of which has some evidence in its favor. This review highlights all the genetic and environmental etiologic factors and focuses on its pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.