Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22923627›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2012

'It's on my iPhone': attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study.

Sean Wallace, Marcia Clark, Jonathan White

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 146 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04637542 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Mobile Learning on Student Success and Anxiety in Teaching the Genital System Anatomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamiyet KIZILRan2018 to 2018Enrolled63ConditionsMobile Phone Use, Educational Problems, AnatomyArmsMobile Learning
NCT06005857 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Use of Paper- Versus Digital Application-based Exercises to Support the Rehabilitation of People Operated by a Palmar Plate for an Intra-articular Distal Radius Fracture. A Multidisciplinary, Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHôpital FribourgeoisRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsDistal Radius FractureArmsStandard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises, standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Digital Health Interventions by Clinical Pharmacists: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. The use of communication applications in orthopaedics: a scoping review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The effect of smartphones and mobile apps in Egyptian Emergency Departments: A cross-sectional study.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025
    Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean WallaceDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Marcia Clark
Jonathan White

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe last decade has seen the introduction of new technology which has transformed many aspects of our culture, commerce, communication and education. This study examined how medical teachers and learners are using mobile computing devices such as the iPhone in medical education and practice, and how they envision them being used in the future.

designSemistructured interviews were conducted with medical students, residents and faculty to examine participants' attitudes about the current and future use of mobile computing devices in medical education and practice. A thematic approach was used to summarise ideas and concepts expressed, and to develop an online survey. A mixed methods approach was used to integrate qualitative and quantitative findings. SETTING AND

participantsMedical students, residents and faculty at a large Canadian medical school in 2011.

resultsInterviews were conducted with 18 participants (10 students, 7 residents and 1 faculty member). Only 213 participants responded to the online survey (76 students, 65 residents and 41 faculty members). Over 85% of participants reported using a mobile-computing device. The main uses described for mobile devices related to information management, communication and time management. Advantages identified were portability, flexibility, access to multimedia and the ability to look up information quickly. Challenges identified included: superficial learning, not understanding how to find good learning resources, distraction, inappropriate use and concerns about access and privacy. Both medical students and physicians expressed the view that the use of these devices in medical education and practice will increase in the future.

conclusionsThis new technology offers the potential to enhance learning and patient care, but also has potential problems associated with its use. It is important for leadership in medical schools and healthcare organisations to set the agenda in this rapidly developing area to maximise the benefits of this powerful new technology while avoiding unintended consequences.

Identifiers

PMID22923627
PMCPMC3432838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.