Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22923291›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2012

EFICAz2.5: application of a high-precision enzyme function predictor to 396 proteomes.

Narendra Kumar, Jeffrey Skolnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. MAHOMES II: A webserver for predicting if a metal binding site is enzymatic.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Synthetic Biology Meets Machine Learning.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Machine learning for enzyme engineering, selection and design.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Narendra KumarCenter for Study of Systems Biology, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30318, USA.
Jeffrey Skolnick

Funding

Interaction Pattern Based Predictor of Protein StruturesR01GM048835 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SKOLNICK, JEFFREY · 1994 to 2015
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-48835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledHigh-quality enzyme function annotation is essential for understanding the biochemistry, metabolism and disease processes of organisms. Previously, we developed a multi-component high-precision enzyme function predictor, EFICAz(2) (enzyme function inference by a combined approach). Here, we present an updated improved version, EFICAz(2.5), that is trained on a significantly larger data set of enzyme sequences and PROSITE patterns. We also present the results of the application of EFICAz(2.5) to the enzyme reannotation of 396 genomes cataloged in the ENSEMBL database. AVAILABILITY: The EFICAz(2.5) server and database is freely available with a use-friendly interface at http://cssb.biology.gatech.edu/EFICAz2.5.

Indexed as

ProteomeSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareDatabases, GeneticEnzymesGenomeHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationEnzymesProteome

Identifiers

PMID22923291
PMCPMC3467752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.