ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2013
Hemodynamically motivated choice of patch angioplasty for the performance of carotid endarterectomy.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comparison of Vessel Patch Materials in Tetralogy of Fallot Patients Using Virtual Surgery Techniques.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Selection criteria for patch angioplasty material in carotid endarterectomy.Surgical neurology international · 2022Review
- Hemodynamic evaluation of endarterectomy and stenting treatments for carotid web.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Biomechanical Aspects of Closing Approaches in Postcarotid Endarterectomy.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2018Article
- An in vivo study of a gold nanocomposite biomaterial for vascular repair.Biomaterials · 2015Article
- A mathematical evaluation of hemodynamic parameters after carotid eversion and conventional patch angioplasty.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patch angioplasty is the most common technique used for the performance of carotid endarterectomy. A large number of materials are available, but little is known to aid the surgeon in choosing a patch while caring for a patient with carotid disease. The objective of this study was to investigate biomechanics of the carotid artery (CA) repaired with patch angioplasty, study the influence of patch width and location of closure on hemodynamics, and to select the optimal patch material from those commonly used. For this purpose, a mathematical model was built that accounts for fluid-structure interaction, three-dimensional arterial geometry, non-linear anisotropic mechanical properties, non-Newtonian flow and in vivo boundary conditions. This model was used to study disease-related mechanical factors in the arterial wall and blood flow for different types of patch angioplasty. Analysis indicated that patch closures performed with autologous vein and bovine pericardium were hemodynamically superior to carotid endarterectomy with synthetic patch angioplasty (polytetrafluoroethylene, Dacron) in terms of restenosis potential. Width of the patch and location of arteriotomy were found to be of paramount importance, with narrow patches being superior to wide patches, and anterior arteriotomy being superior to the lateral arteriotomy. These data can aid vascular surgeons in their selection of patch angioplasty technique and material for the care of patients undergoing open CA repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.