Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22923055›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2012

The success of pharmacogenomics in moving genetic association studies from bench to bedside: study design and implementation of precision medicine in the post-GWAS era.

Marylyn D Ritchie

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Precision medicine, health disparities, and ethics: the case for disability inclusion.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The role of epigenomics in personalized medicine.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marylyn D RitchieDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Center for Systems Genomics, Eberly College of Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. marylyn.ritchie@psu.edu
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Pharmacogenomics of Arrhythmia TherapyU19HL065962 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2010 to 2014
$17.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS U19 HL065962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics is emerging as a popular type of study for human genetics in recent years. This is primarily due to the many success stories and high potential for translation to clinical practice. In this review, the strengths and limitations of pharmacogenomics are discussed as well as the primary epidemiologic, clinical trial, and in vitro study designs implemented. A brief discussion of molecular and analytic approaches will be reviewed. Finally, several examples of bench-to-bedside clinical implementations of pharmacogenetic traits will be described. Pharmacogenomics continues to grow in popularity because of the important genetic associations identified that drive the possibility of precision medicine.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesPharmacogeneticsTranslational Research, BiomedicalEpidemiologic StudiesGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPrecision MedicineResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID22923055
PMCPMC3432217
OpenAlexW2022293269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.