Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22923026›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2012

Evaluating genetic risk for prostate cancer among Japanese and Latinos.

Iona Cheng, Gary K Chen, Hidewaki Nakagawa, Jing He, Peggy Wan, Cathy C Laurie, Jess Shen, Xin Sheng, Loreall C Pooler, Andrew T Crenshaw and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Genetic variation in prostate-specific antigen-detected prostate cancer and the effect of control selection on genetic association studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Characterization of Genetic Etiologic Factors for Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Large Childhood Cancer Survivorship Cohorts.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Leveraging genetic ancestry to study health disparities.American journal of physical anthropology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Iona ChengEpidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, 1236 Lauhala Street, Suite 407, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. icheng@cc.hawaii.edu
Gary K Chen
Hidewaki Nakagawa
Jing He
Peggy Wan
Cathy C Laurie
Jess Shen
Xin Sheng
Loreall C Pooler
Andrew T Crenshaw
Daniel B Mirel
Atsushi Takahashi
Michiaki Kubo
Yusuke Nakamura
Ali Amin Al Olama
Sara Benlloch
Jenny L Donovan
Michelle Guy
Freddie C Hamdy
Zsofia Kote-Jarai
David E Neal
Lynne R Wilkens
Kristine R Monroe
Daniel O Stram
Kenneth Muir
Rosalind A Eeles
Douglas F Easton
Laurence N Kolonel
Brian E Henderson
Loïc Le Marchand
Christopher A Haiman

Funding

University of Hawaii Cancer Center CCSGP30CA071789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Xin Chen · 1996 to 2026
$56.2M
Epidemiological and Clinical Translational Studies Post Genome-Wide AssociationU19CA148537 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EASTON, DOUGLAS FREDERICK, EELES, ROSALIND · 2010 to 2014
$10.4M
Genome Wide Association Coordinating CenterU01HG004446 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEIR, BRUCE S. · 2007 to 2011
$6.6M
A Multiethnic Genome-Wide Scan of Prostate CancerU01HG004726 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HAIMAN, CHRISTOPHER ALAN · 2008 to 2009
$1.2M
Cancer Research UK 10118Cancer Research UK 11022Cancer Research UK A10118Cancer Research UK A10692Cancer Research UK A3354Cancer Research UK A6135Cancer Research UK A6835Cancer Research UK A7357Cancer Research UK C1287/A10118Cancer Research UK C16913/A6135Cancer Research UK C16913/A6835Cancer Research UK C5047Cancer Research UK C5047/A10692Cancer Research UK C5047/A3354Medical Research Council G0500966NCI NIH HHS P30 CA071789NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148537NCI NIH HHS U19 CA 148537-01NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004446NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004726NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004726-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere have been few genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of prostate cancer among diverse populations. To search for novel prostate cancer risk variants, we conducted GWAS of prostate cancer in Japanese and Latinos. In addition, we tested prostate cancer risk variants and developed genetic risk models of prostate cancer for Japanese and Latinos.

methodsOur first-stage GWAS of prostate cancer included Japanese (cases/controls = 1,033/1,042) and Latino (cases/controls = 1,043/1,057) from the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC). Significant associations from stage I (P < 1.0 × 10(-4)) were examined in silico in GWAS of prostate cancer (stage II) in Japanese (cases/controls = 1,583/3,386) and Europeans (cases/controls = 1,854/1,894).

resultsNo novel stage I single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) outside of known risk regions reached genome-wide significance. For Japanese, in stage I, the most notable putative novel association was seen with 10 SNPs (P ≤ 8.0 × 10(-6)) at chromosome 2q33; however, this was not replicated in stage II. For Latinos, the most significant association was observed with rs17023900 at the known 3p12 risk locus (stage I: OR = 1.45; P = 7.01 × 10(-5) and stage II: OR = 1.58; P = 3.05 × 10(-7)). The majority of the established risk variants for prostate cancer, 79% and 88%, were positively associated with prostate cancer in Japanese and Latinos (stage I), respectively. The cumulative effects of these variants significantly influence prostate cancer risk (OR per allele = 1.10; P = 2.71 × 10(-25) and OR = 1.07; P = 1.02 × 10(-16) for Japanese and Latinos, respectively). CONCLUSION AND IMPACT: Our GWAS of prostate cancer did not identify novel genome-wide significant variants. However, our findings show that established risk variants for prostate cancer significantly contribute to risk among Japanese and Latinos.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleCaliforniaCohort StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHawaiiHispanic or LatinoHumansJapanMaleModels, StatisticalNeoplasm StagingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProstatic NeoplasmsRisk

Identifiers

PMID22923026
PMCPMC3494732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.