Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22922908›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2012

Large scale of human duplicate genes divergence.

Alexander E Vinogradov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Enhanced evolution by stochastically variable modification of epigenetic marks in the early embryo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexander E VinogradovInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia. aevin@mail.cytspb.rssi.ru

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteome complexity increases in the evolution mostly by means of gene duplication followed by divergence. In this genome-scale study of human genome I show that density distribution of duplicate gene pairs along the axis of protein divergence between pair members forms two main peaks with a small peak and plateau before the first main peak. This picture indicates the existence of three evolutionary stages of duplicate gene evolution. The analysis of various functional parameters (gene expression level and breadth, transcription factor targets, protein interaction networks) suggests that subfunctionalization (partition of function) is a predominant mode of divergence in the first main peak, whereas neofunctionalization (acquiring of novel functions) prevails in the second main peak. The young duplicate pairs show a much higher expression level compared with singleton genes and more diverged duplicates, which indicates that requirement for high gene dosage is important for retention of duplicates just after the duplication event. Thus, a prevailing route of duplicate evolution seems to be the high gene dosage-subfunctionalization-neofunctionalization. This adaptationist model suggests that an organism is evolving in the direction of its most intensively used functions.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationGenome, HumanModels, GeneticAnimalsGene DosageGene Expression RegulationGenetic VariationHumansProtein Interaction MapsProteomeSequence Analysis, DNAProteome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.