ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2012
Large scale of human duplicate genes divergence.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term asymmetrical acceleration of protein evolution after gene duplication.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Enhanced evolution by stochastically variable modification of epigenetic marks in the early embryo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- Expansion and diversification of BTL ring-H2 ubiquitin ligases in angiosperms: putative Rabring7/BCA2 orthologs.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteome complexity increases in the evolution mostly by means of gene duplication followed by divergence. In this genome-scale study of human genome I show that density distribution of duplicate gene pairs along the axis of protein divergence between pair members forms two main peaks with a small peak and plateau before the first main peak. This picture indicates the existence of three evolutionary stages of duplicate gene evolution. The analysis of various functional parameters (gene expression level and breadth, transcription factor targets, protein interaction networks) suggests that subfunctionalization (partition of function) is a predominant mode of divergence in the first main peak, whereas neofunctionalization (acquiring of novel functions) prevails in the second main peak. The young duplicate pairs show a much higher expression level compared with singleton genes and more diverged duplicates, which indicates that requirement for high gene dosage is important for retention of duplicates just after the duplication event. Thus, a prevailing route of duplicate evolution seems to be the high gene dosage-subfunctionalization-neofunctionalization. This adaptationist model suggests that an organism is evolving in the direction of its most intensively used functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22922908What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.