ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2012
Network for development of electroporation-based technologies and treatments: COST TD1104.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bipolar needle electrodes for electroporation-based treatments in soft and bone tissues: technical design and implementation.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Optimizing electroporation via pulse modulation: a molecular dynamics study.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2025Article
- New insight into teratogenic effects of (S)-thalidomide in zebrafish embryos growing inside the chorion and subjected to electric pulses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Determination of the Impact of High-Intensity Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on the Release of Damage-Associated Molecular Pattern Molecules.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Pearls and Pitfalls of Pulsed Field Ablation.Korean circulation journal · 2023Review
- Design and Characterization of a Minimally Invasive Bipolar Electrode for Electroporation.Biology · 2020Article
- Electrochemotherapy by pulsed electromagnetic field treatment (PEMF) in mouse melanoma B16F10 in vivo.Radiology and oncology · 2016Article
- Recommendations for improving the quality of reporting clinical electrochemotherapy studies based on qualitative systematic review.Radiology and oncology · 2016Review
- Energy-efficient biomass processing with pulsed electric fields for bioeconomy and sustainable development.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2016Review
- Electroporation in food processing and biorefinery.The Journal of membrane biology · 2014Review
- Planning of electroporation-based treatments using Web-based treatment-planning software.The Journal of membrane biology · 2013Article
- Electroporation-based treatment planning for deep-seated tumors based on automatic liver segmentation of MRI images.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exposure of biological cells to a sufficiently strong external electric field results in increased permeability of cell membranes, referred to as "electroporation." Since all types of cells (animal, plant and microorganism) can be effectively electroporated, electroporation is considered to be a universal method and a platform technology. Electroporation has become a widely used technology applicable to, e.g., cancer treatment, gene transfection, food and biomass processing and microbial inactivation. However, despite significant progress in electroporation-based applications, there is a lack of coordination and interdisciplinary exchange of knowledge between researchers from different scientific domains. Thus, critical mass for new major breakthroughs is missing. This is why we decided to establish cooperation between research groups working in different fields of electroporation. Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), which funds networking and capacity-building activities, presents a perfect framework for such scientific cooperation. This COST action aims at (1) providing necessary steps toward EU cooperation of science and technology to foster basic understanding of electroporation; (2) improving communication between research groups, resulting in streamlining European research and development activities; and (3) enabling development of new and further development of existing electroporation-based applications by integrating multidisciplinary research teams, as well as providing comprehensive training for early-stage researchers. Results of this COST action will provide multiple societal, scientific and technological benefits from improving existing electroporation-based applications to adding new ones in the fields of medicine, biotechnology and environmental preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.