Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22922124›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2012

Selective Fos induction in hypothalamic orexin/hypocretin, but not melanin-concentrating hormone neurons, by a learned food-cue that stimulates feeding in sated rats.

G D Petrovich, M P Hobin, C J Reppucci

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Associations of COPhysiology & behavior · 2025
    Article
  4. Sleep deprivation engages the orexin/hypocretin system to regulate food reward seeking.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The prediction-error hypothesis of schizophrenia: new data point to circuit-specific changes in dopamine activity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neuropharmacology of compulsive eating.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G D PetrovichDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, United States. gorica.petrovich@bc.edu
M P Hobin
C J Reppucci
Boston College · US

Funding

Forebrain Circuits and Control of Feeding Behavior by Learned CuesR01DK085721 · NIDDK · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI PETROVICH, GORICA D · 2010 to 2020
$3.4M
Amygdala circuits and control of feeding by learned cuesK01MH067252 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PETROVICH, GORICA D · 2003 to 2007
$693k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK085721NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085721NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH067252NIMH NIH HHS MH67252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Associative learning can enable cues from the environment to stimulate feeding in the absence of physiological hunger. How learned cues are integrated with the homeostatic regulatory system is unknown. Here we examined whether the underlying mechanism involves the hypothalamic orexigenic neuropeptide regulators orexin/hypocretin (ORX) and melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH). We used a Pavlovian conditioning procedure to train food-restricted rats to associate a discrete cue, a tone, with food pellets distinct from their regular lab chow diet. Rats in the conditioned group (Paired) received presentations of a tone immediately prior to food delivery, while the rats in the control group (Unpaired) received random presentations of the same number of tones and food pellets. After conditioning rats were allowed ad libitum access to lab chow for at least 10days before testing. At test sated rats were presented with the tones in their home cages, and then one group was allowed to consume food pellets, while another group was left undisturbed until sacrifice for Fos induction analysis. The tone cue stimulated food consumption in this setting; rats in the Paired group consumed larger amounts of food pellets than rats in the Unpaired group. To examine Fos induction we processed the brain tissue using fluorescent immunohistochemistry methods for combined detection of Fos and characterization of ORX and MCH neurons. We found a greater percentage of ORX and Fos double-labeled neurons in the Paired compared to the Unpaired condition, specifically in the perifornical area. In contrast, there were very few MCH neurons with Fos induction in both the Paired and Unpaired conditions. Thus, the food-cue selectively induced Fos in ORX but not in MCH neurons. These results suggest a role for ORX in cue-induced feeding that occurs in the absence of physiological hunger.

Indexed as

CuesAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalFeeding BehaviorHypothalamic HormonesHypothalamusIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLearningMaleMelaninsNeuronsNeuropeptidesOrexinsPituitary HormonesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosRatsHypothalamic HormonesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteinsmelanin-concentrating hormoneMelaninsNeuropeptidesOrexinsPituitary HormonesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos

Identifiers

PMID22922124
PMCPMC3689536
OpenAlexW2073128262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.