ArticleVaccine2012
Effects of route and coadministration of recombinant raccoon poxviruses on immune responses and protection against highly pathogenic avian influenza in mice.
Article in Vaccine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Viral vector-based influenza vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016Pooled it
- Safety and immunogenicity of orally administered poxvirus vectored constructs in the white-footed mouse (Vaccine: X · 2023Article
- Developmental Landscape of Potential Vaccine Candidates Based on Viral Vector for Prophylaxis of COVID-19.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- Virally-vectored vaccine candidates against white-nose syndrome induce anti-fungal immune response in little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus).Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The evolution of poxvirus vaccines.Viruses · 2015Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We previously demonstrated that recombinant raccoonpox (RCN) virus could serve as a vector for an influenza vaccine. RCN constructs expressing the hemagglutinin (HA) from H5N1 viruses were immunogenic in chickens. In the current study, we generated several recombinant RCN constructs expressing influenza (H5N1) antigens and a molecular adjuvant (Heat-Labile enterotoxin B from E. coli: RCN-LTB), demonstrated their expression in vitro, and evaluated their ability to protect mice against H5N1 virus challenge. RCN-HA provided strong protection when administered intradermally (ID), but not intranasally (IN). Conversely, the RCN-neuraminidase (NA) construct was highly efficacious by the IN route and elicited high titers of neutralizing antibodies in mice. Vaccination by combined ID (RCN-HA) and IN (RCN-NA) routes offered mice the best protection against an IN challenge with heterologous H5N1 virus. However, protection was reduced when the different RCN constructs were pre-mixed, perhaps due to reduced expression of antigen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.