ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2012
A review of a family of ultra-rapid-acting insulins: formulation development.
Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Short-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adult, non-pregnant persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Short-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Ultra rapid lispro improves postprandial glucose control compared with lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes: Results from the 26-week PRONTO-T1D study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2020Trial
- Intradermal insulin infusion achieves faster insulin action than subcutaneous infusion for 3-day wear.Drug delivery and translational research · 2015Trial
- Faster-acting insulin aspart: earlier onset of appearance and greater early pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects than insulin aspart.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2015Trial
- Photoacoustic imaging reveals mechanisms of rapid-acting insulin formulations dynamics at the injection site.Molecular metabolism · 2022Article
- New Horizons: Next-Generation Insulin Analogues: Structural Principles and Clinical Goals.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022Review
- Structural principles of insulin formulation and analog design: A century of innovation.Molecular metabolism · 2021Review
- Engineering biopharmaceutical formulations to improve diabetes management.Science translational medicine · 2021Review
- Ultrafast acting insulin analog - a new way to prevent postprandial hyperglycemia and improve quality of life in type 1 diabetes patients - case reports.Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2021Article
- Ultra-Rapid Lispro Efficacy and Safety Compared to HumalogDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020Article
- Ultra-Rapid Lispro Efficacy and Safety Compared to Humalog® in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: PRONTO-T2D Subpopulation Analysis.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020Article
- The continuing quest for better subcutaneously administered prandial insulins: a review of recent developments and potential clinical implications.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2020Review
- Pharmacological Properties of Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart.Current diabetes reports · 2017Review
- Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: getting better all the time.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2017Review
- Identifying and meeting the challenges of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2014Review
- Ultrafast-acting insulins: state of the art.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review summarizes the clinical development of a family of ultra-rapid-acting recombinant human insulin formulations. These formulations use ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to chelate zinc and thereby destabilize insulin hexamers. In addition, insulin monomer surface charges are chemically masked with citrate to prevent reaggregation. The first phase 1 trials were performed using BIOD-090, an acidic 25 unit U/ml insulin formulation, which contained disodium-EDTA (NaEDTA). When compared with regular human insulin (RHI) and/or insulin lispro in multiple phase 1 studies, BIOD-090 consistently showed more rapid absorption and/or onset of action. A standard meal challenge study also demonstrated improved postprandial glucose profiles associated with BIOD-090. However, increased patient exposure in larger phase 3 trials showed that this formulation was associated with an increased incidence of local injection site reactions, most commonly pain. A next generation formulation, BIOD-100, contained the same excipients as a standard insulin concentration of 100 U/ml. BIOD-100 maintained an ultra-rapid action profile and was associated with modest but significantly improved toleration when compared with BIOD-090. In order to further improve toleration, the hypothesis that NaEDTA contributed to discomfort by chelating endogenous calcium was tested by either substituting calcium-EDTA for NaEDTA or by adding calcium chloride to the NaEDTA formulation. These calcium formulations essentially eliminated the excess discomfort associated with BIOD-090 but were associated with less optimal pharmacokinetic profiles in humans. Recent efforts have succeeded in developing ultra-rapid-acting human insulin formulations with acceptable injection site toleration by optimizing concentrations of calcium (BIOD-125) and with the use of magnesium sulfate to mitigate discomfort (BIOD-123). Similar formulation technology has also been shown to accelerate absorption of insulin analogs in animal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.