Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22920184›Full record

ReviewEpigenomics2012

DNA demethylation by TDG.

Shannon R Dalton, Alfonso Bellacosa

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenomics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Methylation of cation-chloride cotransporters NKCC1 and KCC2 in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon R DaltonCancer Biology Program, Epigenetics & Progenitor Cells Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, PA 19111, USA.
Alfonso Bellacosa
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USiCeutica (United States) · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
The MED1 Protein in DNA Damage Response and RepairR01CA078412 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI BELLACOSA, ALFONSO · 2004 to 2014
$3.7M
NEW HUMAN DNA REPAIR ENDONUCLEASER29CA078412 · NCI · FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER · PI BELLACOSA, ALFONSO · 1998 to 2002
$619k
NCI NIH HHS CA06927NCI NIH HHS CA78412NCI NIH HHS R01 CA078412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation has long been considered a very stable DNA modification in mammals that could only be removed by replication in the absence of remethylation - that is, by mere dilution of this epigenetic mark (so-called passive DNA demethylation). However, in recent years, a significant number of studies have revealed the existence of active processes of DNA demethylation in mammals, with important roles in development and transcriptional regulation, allowing the molecular mechanisms of active DNA demethylation to be unraveled. In this article, we review the recent literature highlighting the prominent role played in active DNA demethylation by base excision repair and especially by TDG.

Indexed as

AnimalsCpG IslandsDNA MethylationDNA RepairGene Expression RegulationMiceThymine DNA GlycosylaseTranscription, GeneticThymine DNA Glycosylase

Identifiers

PMID22920184
PMCPMC3600859
OpenAlexW2001319028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.