Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22919640›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2012

Genetic manipulation of Staphylococci-breaking through the barrier.

Ian R Monk, Timothy J Foster

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic engineering ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ThemBio · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Novel Variants of SCCAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian R MonkDepartment of Microbiology, Moyne Institute of Preventive Medicine, School of Genetics and Microbiology, Trinity College Dublin Dublin, Ireland. monki@tcd.ie
Timothy J Foster
Trinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis possess a strong restriction barrier that hinders exchange of DNA. Recently, major advances have been made in identifying and characterizing the restriction-modification (RM) systems involved. In particular a novel type IV restriction enzyme that recognizes cytosine methylated DNA has been shown to be the major barrier to transfer of plasmid DNA from Escherichia coli into S. aureus and S. epidermidis. While the conserved type I RM system provides a further barrier. Here we review the recent advances in understanding of restriction systems in staphylococci and highlight how this has been exploited to improve our ability to manipulate genetically previously untransformable strains.

Indexed as

DNA Restriction-Modification EnzymesGene Transfer, HorizontalEscherichia coliGene Transfer TechniquesPlasmidsStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisDNA Restriction-Modification Enzymesallelic exchangeaureuselectroporationepidermidismutationrestriction-modificationstaphylococcustransformation

Identifiers

PMID22919640
PMCPMC3417578
OpenAlexW1494068198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.