Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22919636›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2012

Multilocus sequence typing methods for the emerging Campylobacter Species C. hyointestinalis, C. lanienae, C. sputorum, C. concisus, and C. curvus.

William G Miller, Mary H Chapman, Emma Yee, Stephen L W On, Desmond K McNulty, Albert J Lastovica, Anne M Carroll, Eleanor B McNamara, Geraldine Duffy, Robert E Mandrell

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  2. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Investigation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Markers for discriminatingCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Analysis of completeMicrobial genomics · 2020
    Article
  12. Co-occurrence ofFrontiers in public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Pathogenomics of EmergingClinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Clinical Importance ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

William G MillerUSDA, ARS, WRRC, Produce Safety and Microbiology Albany, CA, USA. william.miller@ars.usda.gov
Mary H Chapman
Emma Yee
Stephen L W On
Desmond K McNulty
Albert J Lastovica
Anne M Carroll
Eleanor B McNamara
Geraldine Duffy
Robert E Mandrell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) systems have been reported previously for multiple food- and food animal-associated Campylobacter species (e.g., C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. fetus) to both differentiate strains and identify clonal lineages. These MLST methods focused primarily on campylobacters of human clinical (e.g., C. jejuni) or veterinary (e.g., C. fetus) relevance. However, other, emerging, Campylobacter species have been isolated increasingly from environmental, food animal, or human clinical samples. We describe herein four MLST methods for five emerging Campylobacter species: C. hyointestinalis, C. lanienae, C. sputorum, C. concisus, and C. curvus. The concisus/curvus method uses the loci aspA, atpA, glnA, gltA, glyA, ilvD, and pgm, whereas the other methods use the seven loci defined for C. jejuni (i.e., aspA, atpA, glnA, gltA, glyA, pgm, and tkt). Multiple food animal and human clinical C. hyointestinalis (n = 48), C. lanienae (n = 34), and C. sputorum (n = 24) isolates were typed, along with 86 human clinical C. concisus and C. curvus isolates. A large number of sequence types were identified using all four MLST methods. Additionally, these methods speciated unequivocally isolates that had been typed ambiguously using other molecular-based speciation methods, such as 16S rDNA sequencing. Finally, the design of degenerate primer pairs for some methods permitted the typing of related species; for example, the C. hyointestinalis primer pairs could be used to type C. fetus strains. Therefore, these novel Campylobacter MLST methods will prove useful in differentiating strains of multiple, emerging Campylobacter species.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticBacterial ProteinsCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersGenotypeHumansMultilocus Sequence TypingBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersCampylobacter concisusCampylobacter curvusCampylobacter hyointestinalisCampylobacter lanienaeCampylobacter sputorumemergingMLST

Identifiers

PMID22919636
PMCPMC3417633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.