Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22919296›Full record

ReviewTheScientificWorldJournal2012

Caatinga revisited: ecology and conservation of an important seasonal dry forest.

Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque, Elcida de Lima Araújo, Ana Carla Asfora El-Deir, André Luiz Alves de Lima, Antonio Souto, Bruna Martins Bezerra, Elba Maria Nogueira Ferraz, Eliza Maria Xavier Freire, Everardo Valadares de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Flor Maria Guedes Las-Casas and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 270 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ulysses Paulino de AlbuquerqueDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, 52171-900 Recife, PE, Brazil. upa677@hotmail.com
Elcida de Lima Araújo
Ana Carla Asfora El-Deir
André Luiz Alves de Lima
Antonio Souto
Bruna Martins Bezerra
Elba Maria Nogueira Ferraz
Eliza Maria Xavier Freire
Everardo Valadares de Sá Barreto Sampaio
Flor Maria Guedes Las-Casas
Geraldo Jorge Barbosa de Moura
Glauco Alves Pereira
Joabe Gomes de Melo
Marcelo Alves Ramos
Maria Jesus Nogueira Rodal
Nicola Schiel
Rachel Maria de Lyra-Neves
Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves
Severino Mendes de Azevedo-Júnior
Wallace Rodrigues Telino Júnior
William Severi
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Estadual da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Besides its extreme climate conditions, the Caatinga (a type of tropical seasonal forest) hosts an impressive faunal and floristic biodiversity. In the last 50 years there has been a considerable increase in the number of studies in the area. Here we aimed to present a review of these studies, focusing on four main fields: vertebrate ecology, plant ecology, human ecology, and ethnobiology. Furthermore, we identify directions for future research. We hope that the present paper will help defining actions and strategies for the conservation of the biological diversity of the Caatinga.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcologySeasonsAnimalsBiodiversityBrazilHumansPlants

Identifiers

PMID22919296
PMCPMC3415163
OpenAlexW2160034843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.