ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2012
AACP strategy for addressing the professional development needs of department chairs.
Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Journal Publications of Pharmacy Practice Department Chairs.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2021Article
- Perceived Value of Teaching and Learning Curriculum Programs Among Pharmacy Practice Department Chairs.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2020Article
- Use of a Modified Delphi Process to Define the Leadership Characteristics Expected of Pharmacy Faculty Members.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019Article
- Core competencies for academic leaders in Iran University of Medical Sciences.Advances in medical education and practice · 2019Article
- Educational Attainment and Academic Profile of Deans and Chairs at US Pharmacy Schools.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCharacterize the skills and abilities required for department chairs, identify development needs, and then create AACP professional development programs for chairs.
methodsA 30-question electronic survey was sent to AACP member department chairs related to aspects of chairing an academic department.
resultsThe survey identified development needs in the leadership, management, and personal abilities required for effective performance as department chair. The information was used to prioritize topics for subsequent AACP development programs. Subsequent programs conducted at AACP Interim and Annual Meetings were well attended and generally received favorable reviews from participants. A list of development resources was placed on the AACP website.
conclusionsThis ongoing initiative is part of an AACP strategy to identify and address the professional development needs of department chairs. Survey results may also inform faculty members and other academic leaders about the roles and responsibilities of department chairs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.