Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22919050›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2012

Mutational analysis of Trypanosoma brucei editosome proteins KREPB4 and KREPB5 reveals domains critical for function.

Jason Carnes, Achim Schnaufer, Suzanne M McDermott, Gonzalo Domingo, Rose Proff, Alodie G Steinberg, Irina Kurtz, Kenneth Stuart

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deep mutational scanning of the RNase III-like domain inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How RNases Shape Mitochondrial Transcriptomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Architecture of Trypanosoma brucei editosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason CarnesSeattle Biomedical Research Institute, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
Achim Schnaufer
Suzanne M McDermott
Gonzalo Domingo
Rose Proff
Alodie G Steinberg
Irina Kurtz
Kenneth Stuart
Center for Infectious Disease Research · US

Funding

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA OF NORMAL AND MUTANT TRYPANOSOMESR01AI014102 · NIAID · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI KENNETH D STUART · 1985 to 2026
$20.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI014102NIAID NIH HHS R01AI014102Wellcome Trust 095831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transcriptome of kinetoplastid mitochondria undergoes extensive RNA editing that inserts and deletes uridine residues (U's) to produce mature mRNAs. The editosome is a multiprotein complex that provides endonuclease, TUTase, exonuclease, and ligase activities required for RNA editing. The editosome's KREPB4 and KREPB5 proteins are essential for editosome integrity and parasite viability and contain semi-conserved motifs corresponding to zinc finger, RNase III, and PUF domains, but to date no functional analysis of these domains has been reported. We show here that various point mutations to KREPB4 and KREPB5 identify essential domains, and suggest that these proteins do not themselves perform RNase III catalysis. The zinc finger of KREPB4 but not KREPB5 is essential for editosome integrity and parasite viability, and mutation of the RNase III signature motif in KREPB5 prevents integration into editosomes, which is lethal. Isolated TAP-tagged KREPB4 and KREPB5 complexes preferentially associate with components of the deletion subcomplex, providing additional insights into editosome architecture. A new alignment of editosome RNase III sequences from several kinetoplastid species implies that KREPB4 and KREPB5 lack catalytic activity and reveals that the PUF motif is present in the editing endonucleases KREN1, KREN2, and KREN3. The data presented here are consistent with the hypothesis that KREPB4 and KREPB5 form intermolecular heterodimers with the catalytically active editing endonucleases, which is unprecedented among known RNase III proteins.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionCatalytic DomainDNA Mutational AnalysisGenome, ProtozoanMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein Structure, TertiaryProtozoan ProteinsRibonucleoproteinsRNA EditingRNA, MessengerRNA, ProtozoanSequence HomologyTrypanosoma brucei bruceiProtozoan ProteinsRibonucleoproteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID22919050
PMCPMC3446712
OpenAlexW2135655270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.