ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2013
Molecular reconstruction of extinct LINE-1 elements and their interaction with nonautonomous elements.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lamivudine (3TC), a Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor, Prevents the Neuropathological Alterations Present in Mutant Tau Transgenic Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Somatic retrotransposition in the developing rhesus macaque brain.Genome research · 2022Article
- Human L1 Transposition Dynamics Unraveled with Functional Data Analysis.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- A Model-Driven Quantitative Analysis of Retrotransposon Distributions in the Human Genome.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- LINE-1 ORF1p does not determine substrate preference for human/orangutan SVA and gibbon LAVA.Mobile DNA · 2020Article
- Reviving a 60 million year old LINE-1 element.Gene reports · 2018Article
- Truncated ORF1 proteins can suppress LINE-1 retrotransposition in trans.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Identification of L1 ORF2p sequence important to retrotransposition using Bipartile Alu retrotransposition (BAR).Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- The endonuclease domain of the LINE-1 ORF2 protein can tolerate multiple mutations.Mobile DNA · 2016Article
- The potential role of Alu Y in the development of resistance to SN38 (Irinotecan) or oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Identification of novel exonic mobile element insertions in epithelial ovarian cancers.Human genome variation · 2015Article
- Insertion of Retrotransposons at Chromosome Ends: Adaptive Response to Chromosome Maintenance.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Review
- Reviving the dead: history and reactivation of an extinct l1.PLoS genetics · 2014Article
- Potential for genomic instability associated with retrotranspositionally-incompetent L1 loci.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Rates and patterns of great ape retrotransposition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- RNA-Mediated Gene Duplication and Retroposons: Retrogenes, LINEs, SINEs, and Sequence Specificity.International journal of evolutionary biology · 2013Article
- Composite non-LTR retrotransposons in hominoid primates.Mobile genetic elementsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-long terminal repeat retroelements continue to impact the human genome through cis-activity of long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) and trans-mobilization of Alu. Current activity is dominated by modern subfamilies of these elements, leaving behind an evolutionary graveyard of extinct Alu and L1 subfamilies. Because Alu is a nonautonomous element that relies on L1 to retrotranspose, there is the possibility that competition between these elements has driven selection and antagonistic coevolution between Alu and L1. Through analysis of synonymous versus nonsynonymous codon evolution across L1 subfamilies, we find that the C-terminal ORF2 cys domain experienced a dramatic increase in amino acid substitution rate in the transition from L1PA5 to L1PA4 subfamilies. This observation coincides with the previously reported rapid evolution of ORF1 during the same transition period. Ancestral Alu sequences have been previously reconstructed, as their short size and ubiquity have made it relatively easy to retrieve consensus sequences from the human genome. In contrast, creating constructs of extinct L1 copies is a more laborious task. Here, we report our efforts to recreate and evaluate the retrotransposition capabilities of two ancestral L1 elements, L1PA4 and L1PA8 that were active ~18 and ~40 Ma, respectively. Relative to the modern L1PA1 subfamily, we find that both elements are similarly active in a cell culture retrotransposition assay in HeLa, and both are able to efficiently trans-mobilize Alu elements from several subfamilies. Although we observe some variation in Alu subfamily retrotransposition efficiency, any coevolution that may have occurred between LINEs and SINEs is not evident from these data. Population dynamics and stochastic variation in the number of active source elements likely play an important role in individual LINE or SINE subfamily amplification. If coevolution also contributes to changing retrotransposition rates and the progression of subfamilies, cell factors are likely to play an important mediating role in changing LINE-SINE interactions over evolutionary time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.