Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22918960›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2013

Molecular reconstruction of extinct LINE-1 elements and their interaction with nonautonomous elements.

Bradley J Wagstaff, Emily N Kroutter, Rebecca S Derbes, Victoria P Belancio, Astrid M Roy-Engel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rates and patterns of great ape retrotransposition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bradley J WagstaffDepartment of Epidemiology and Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Emily N Kroutter
Rebecca S Derbes
Victoria P Belancio
Astrid M Roy-Engel

Funding

UNCOVERING THE MECHANISMS OF OSTEOSARCOMA METASTASIS SUPPRESSION BY MTBPP20RR020152 · NCRR · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI YOU, ZONGBING · 2004 to 2011
$17.0M
Mentoring a Cancer Genetics ProgramP20GM103518 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI DEININGER, PRESCOTT L. · 2012 to 2013
$4.3M
Regulatory effects of LINE components on SINE mobilizationR01GM079709 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI ENGEL, ASTRID M · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
L 1 element as an inrinsic factor of mammalian agingK01AG030074 · NIA · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI BELANCIO, VICTORIA PEREPELITSA · 2008 to 2012
$504k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020152NIA NIH HHS 5K01AG030074-02NIA NIH HHS K01 AG030074NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103518NIGMS NIH HHS P20 P20GM103518NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079709NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079709-01PHS HHS PRR020152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-long terminal repeat retroelements continue to impact the human genome through cis-activity of long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) and trans-mobilization of Alu. Current activity is dominated by modern subfamilies of these elements, leaving behind an evolutionary graveyard of extinct Alu and L1 subfamilies. Because Alu is a nonautonomous element that relies on L1 to retrotranspose, there is the possibility that competition between these elements has driven selection and antagonistic coevolution between Alu and L1. Through analysis of synonymous versus nonsynonymous codon evolution across L1 subfamilies, we find that the C-terminal ORF2 cys domain experienced a dramatic increase in amino acid substitution rate in the transition from L1PA5 to L1PA4 subfamilies. This observation coincides with the previously reported rapid evolution of ORF1 during the same transition period. Ancestral Alu sequences have been previously reconstructed, as their short size and ubiquity have made it relatively easy to retrieve consensus sequences from the human genome. In contrast, creating constructs of extinct L1 copies is a more laborious task. Here, we report our efforts to recreate and evaluate the retrotransposition capabilities of two ancestral L1 elements, L1PA4 and L1PA8 that were active ~18 and ~40 Ma, respectively. Relative to the modern L1PA1 subfamily, we find that both elements are similarly active in a cell culture retrotransposition assay in HeLa, and both are able to efficiently trans-mobilize Alu elements from several subfamilies. Although we observe some variation in Alu subfamily retrotransposition efficiency, any coevolution that may have occurred between LINEs and SINEs is not evident from these data. Population dynamics and stochastic variation in the number of active source elements likely play an important role in individual LINE or SINE subfamily amplification. If coevolution also contributes to changing retrotransposition rates and the progression of subfamilies, cell factors are likely to play an important mediating role in changing LINE-SINE interactions over evolutionary time.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, HumanAlu ElementsCodonConsensus SequenceEndonucleasesHeLa CellsHumansLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsRNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseShort Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsTerminal Repeat SequencesCodonEndonucleasesORF2 protein, humanRNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID22918960
PMCPMC3525338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.