Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22918807›Full record

ReviewResults and problems in cell differentiation2012

Cell lineage allocation within the inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst.

Panagiotis Xenopoulos, Minjung Kang, Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Results and problems in cell differentiation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transition state dynamics during a stochastic fate choice.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The birth of embryonic pluripotency.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The WNT signaling antagonist Dickkopf-1 directs lineage commitment and promotes survival of the preimplantation embryo.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2014
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Panagiotis XenopoulosDevelopmental Biology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Minjung Kang
Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Kettering University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Morphogenesis of the paraxial mesoderm in miceR01HD052115 · NICHD · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HADJANTONAKIS, ANNA-KATERINA · 2006 to 2015
$4.1M
Morphogenesis of mammalian gut endodermR01DK084391 · NIDDK · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HADJANTONAKIS, ANNA-KATERINA · 2009 to 2018
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD052115NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK084391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the time of implantation, the early mouse embryo consists of three distinct cell lineages: the epiblast (EPI), primitive endoderm (PrE), and trophectoderm (TE). Here we will focus on the EPI and PrE cell lineages, which arise within the inner cell mass (ICM) of the blastocyst. Though still poorly understood, our current understanding of the mechanisms underlying this lineage allocation will be discussed. It was originally thought that lineage choice was strictly controlled by the position of a cell within the ICM. However, it is now believed that the EPI and PrE lineages are defined both by their position and by the expression of lineage-specific transcription factors. Interestingly, these lineage-specific transcription factors are initially co-expressed in early ICM cells, suggesting an initial multi-lineage priming state. Thereafter, lineage-specific transcription factors display a mutually exclusive salt-and-pepper distribution that reflects cell specification of the EPI or PrE fates. Later on, lineage segregation and likely commitment are completed with the sequestration of PrE cells to the surface of the ICM, which lies at the blastocyst cavity roof. We discuss recent advances that have focused on elucidating how the salt-and-pepper pattern is established and then resolved within the ICM, leading to the correct apposition of cell lineages in preparation for implantation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCell LineageEctodermEndodermGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMiceTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID22918807
PMCPMC3469159
OpenAlexW118390587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.