ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2013
Prediction of people's origin from degraded DNA--presentation of SNP assays and calculation of probability.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forensic DNA phenotyping: a review on SNP panels, genotyping techniques, and prediction models.Forensic sciences research · 2025Review
- A panel of 130 autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphisms for ancestry assignment in five Asian populations and in Caucasians.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2017Article
- Assessment of IrisPlex-based multiplex for eye and skin color prediction with application to a Portuguese population.International journal of legal medicine · 2015Article
- Application of six IrisPlex SNPs and comparison of two eye color prediction systems in diverse Eurasia populations.International journal of legal medicine · 2014Article
- Determination of population origin: a comparison of autosomal SNPs, Y-chromosomal and mtDNA haplogroups using a Malagasy population as example.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The characterization of externally visible traits by DNA analysis is already an important tool when investigating ancient skeletal remains and may gain similar importance in future forensic DNA analysis. This, however, depends on the different legal regulations in the different countries. Besides eye or hair color, the population origin can provide crucial information in criminal prosecution. In this study, we present the analysis of 16 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) combined to two robust SNaPshot assays with a detection threshold of 25-pg DNA. This assay was applied to 891 people from seven different populations (West Africa, North Africa, Turkey, Near East, Balkan states, North Europe, and Japan) with a thorough statistical evaluation. The prediction model was validated by an additional 125 individuals predominantly with an ancestry from those same regions. The specificity of these SNPs for the prediction of all population origins is very high (>90 %), but the sensitivity varied greatly (more than 90 % for West Africa, but only 25 % for the Near East). We could identify West Africans with a certainty of 100 %, and people from North Africa, the Balkan states, or North Europe nearly with the same reliability while determination of Turks or people from the Near East was rather difficult. In conclusion, the two SNaPshot assays are a powerful and reliable tool for the identification of people with an ancestry in one of the above listed populations, even from degraded DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22918435What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.