Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22918426›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2013

Cerebral hemodynamic benefits after contralateral carotid artery stenting in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion.

F Oka, H Ishihara, S Kato, M Higashi, M Suzuki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of Internal Carotid Stenosis Treatment on Cerebral Blood Flow Volume: A Comparative Study between Preoperative and Postoperative Values.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Carotid Endarterectomy with Routine Shunt for Patients with Contralateral Carotid Occlusion.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F OkaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan. okafumiaki85@yahoo.co.jp
H Ishihara
S Kato
M Higashi
M Suzuki
Yamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CEA contralateral to an ICA occlusion is considered a surgical risk, and CAS may be an alternative for these patients. Our goal was to examine whether CAS improves cerebral hemodynamics on the treated side and on the side of the ICA occlusion, on the basis of measurement of CBF and CVR by using SPECT. The subjects were 8 patients who underwent contralateral CAS. Resting CBF and CVR to acetazolamide were measured by using (123)I-IMP SPECT before and chronically (3-6 months) after CAS. Resting CBF was also measured immediately (<2 hours) after CAS by using (123)I-IMP SPECT. There were no significant differences in resting CBF in both hemispheres immediately after CAS. However, resting CBF and CVR both significantly increased in the chronic period in both hemispheres. Contralateral CAS in patients with ICA occlusion resulted in cerebral hemodynamic improvement on the treated side and on the side of ICA occlusion.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisCerebrovascular CirculationStentsAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Flow VelocityCarotid ArteriesCarotid StenosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadionuclide Imaging

Identifiers

PMID22918426
PMCPMC7964908
OpenAlexW2152257958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.