Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22917971›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2012

Protein folding: adding a nucleus to guide helix docking reduces landscape roughness.

Beth G Wensley, Lee Gyan Kwa, Sarah L Shammas, Joseph M Rogers, Jane Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Take home lessons from studies of related proteins.Current opinion in structural biology · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beth G WensleyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
Lee Gyan Kwa
Sarah L Shammas
Joseph M Rogers
Jane Clarke

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust 095195Wellcome Trust GR064417MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elongated three-helix-bundle spectrin domains R16 and R17 fold and unfold unusually slowly over a rough energy landscape, in contrast to the homologue R15, which folds fast over a much smoother, more typical landscape. R15 folds via a nucleation-condensation mechanism that guides the docking of the A and C-helices. However, in R16 and R17, the secondary structure forms first and the two helices must then dock in the correct register. Here, we use variants of R16 and R17 to demonstrate that substitution of just five key residues is sufficient to alter the folding mechanism and reduce the landscape roughness. We suggest that, by providing access to an alternative, faster, folding route over their landscape, R16 and R17 can circumvent their slow, frustrated wild-type folding mechanism.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationProtein Structure, TertiaryAmino Acid SubstitutionKineticsModels, MolecularMutationProtein DenaturationProtein FoldingProtein Structure, SecondarySpectrinThermodynamicsViscositySpectrin

Identifiers

PMID22917971
PMCPMC3469821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.