ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2012
CDS: a fold-change based statistical test for concomitant identification of distinctness and similarity in gene expression analysis.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Scorecard for Information Synthesis in Multiple Experimental Conditions: Application to Bacterial Biofilm Matrix Transcriptomics.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- HIC1 controls cellular- and HIV-1- gene transcription via interactions with CTIP2 and HMGA1.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Delayed inflammatory and cell death responses are associated with reduced pathogenicity in Lujo virus-infected cynomolgus macaques.Journal of virology · 2015Article
- HMGA1 recruits CTIP2-repressed P-TEFb to the HIV-1 and cellular target promoters.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- A TDG/CBP/RARα ternary complex mediates the retinoic acid-dependent expression of DNA methylation-sensitive genes.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Alternative splicing of TAF6: downstream transcriptome impacts and upstream RNA splice control elements.PloS one · 2014Article
- Systems approaches to influenza-virus host interactions and the pathogenesis of highly virulent and pandemic viruses.Seminars in immunology · 2013Review
- CTIP2 is a negative regulator of P-TEFb.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- Specific mutations in H5N1 mainly impact the magnitude and velocity of the host response in mice.BMC systems biology · 2013Article
- 1918 Influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) and the viral RNA polymerase complex enhance viral pathogenicity, but only HA induces aberrant host responses in mice.Journal of virology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The problem of identifying differential activity such as in gene expression is a major defeat in biostatistics and bioinformatics. Equally important, however much less frequently studied, is the question of similar activity from one biological condition to another. The fold-change, or ratio, is usually considered a relevant criterion for stating difference and similarity between measurements. Importantly, no statistical method for concomitant evaluation of similarity and distinctness currently exists for biological applications. Modern microarray, digital PCR (dPCR), and Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies frequently provide a means of coefficient of variation estimation for individual measurements. Using fold-change, and by making the assumption that measurements are normally distributed with known variances, we designed a novel statistical test that allows us to detect concomitantly, thus using the same formalism, differentially and similarly expressed genes (http://cds.ihes.fr). Given two sets of gene measurements in different biological conditions, the probabilities of making type I and type II errors in stating that a gene is differentially or similarly expressed from one condition to the other can be calculated. Furthermore, a confidence interval for the fold-change can be delineated. Finally, we demonstrate that the assumption of normality can be relaxed to consider arbitrary distributions numerically. The Concomitant evaluation of Distinctness and Similarity (CDS) statistical test correctly estimates similarities and differences between measurements of gene expression. The implementation, being time and memory efficient, allows the use of the CDS test in high-throughput data analysis such as microarray, dPCR, and NGS experiments. Importantly, the CDS test can be applied to the comparison of single measurements (N=1) provided the variance (or coefficient of variation) of the signals is known, making CDS a valuable tool also in biomedical analysis where typically a single measurement per subject is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.