Trial reportPloS one2012
Detection of simple and pattern regularity violations occurs at different levels of the auditory hierarchy.
Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oscillatory brain indexes of auditory-induced predictions about contingences during vocalizations.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Predictive coding: a more cognitive process than we thought?Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- Altered hierarchical auditory predictive processing after lesions to the orbitofrontal cortex.eLife · 2024Article
- Attention is required for canonical brain signature of prediction error despite early encoding of the stimuli.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Sensory Target Detection at Local and Global Timescales Reveals a Hierarchy of Supramodal Dynamics in the Human Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
- Predictive encoding of pure tones and FM-sweeps in the human auditory cortex.Cerebral cortex communications · 2022Article
- Statistical learning of transition patterns in the songbird auditory forebrain.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2020Review
- The implicit learning of metrical and non-metrical rhythms in blind and sighted adults.Psychological research · 2019Article
- Neural Correlate of Transition Violation and Deviance Detection in the Songbird Auditory Forebrain.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2018Article
- Premotor neural correlates of predictive motor timing for speech production and hand movement: evidence for a temporal predictive code in the motor system.Experimental brain research · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- Implicit learning of predictable sound sequences modulates human brain responses at different levels of the auditory hierarchy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2015Article
- Deviance-Related Responses along the Auditory Hierarchy: Combined FFR, MLR and MMN Evidence.PloS one · 2015Article
- Encoding of nested levels of acoustic regularity in hierarchically organized areas of the human auditory cortex.Human brain mapping · 2014Article
- Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of cognitive dysfunction.Brain topography · 2014Review
- A hierarchy of responses to auditory regularities in the macaque brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014Article
- Neuronal adaptation, novelty detection and regularity encoding in audition.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Auditory deviance detection in humans is indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN), a component of the auditory evoked potential (AEP) of the electroencephalogram (EEG) occurring at a latency of 100-250 ms after stimulus onset. However, by using classic oddball paradigms, differential responses to regularity violations of simple auditory features have been found at the level of the middle latency response (MLR) of the AEP occurring within the first 50 ms after stimulus (deviation) onset. These findings suggest the existence of fast deviance detection mechanisms for simple feature changes, but it is not clear whether deviance detection among more complex acoustic regularities could be observed at such early latencies. To test this, we examined the pre-attentive processing of rare stimulus repetitions in a sequence of tones alternating in frequency in both long and middle latency ranges. Additionally, we introduced occasional changes in the interaural time difference (ITD), so that a simple-feature regularity could be examined in the same paradigm. MMN was obtained for both repetition and ITD deviants, occurring at 150 ms and 100 ms after stimulus onset respectively. At the level of the MLR, a difference was observed between standards and ITD deviants at the Na component (20-30 ms after stimulus onset), for 800 Hz tones, but not for repetition deviants. These findings suggest that detection mechanisms for deviants to simple regularities, but not to more complex regularities, are already activated in the MLR range, supporting the view that the auditory deviance detection system is organized in a hierarchical manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.