Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22916280›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Transcriptional and metabolic insights into the differential physiological responses of arabidopsis to optimal and supraoptimal atmospheric CO2.

Fatma Kaplan, Wei Zhao, Jeffrey T Richards, Raymond M Wheeler, Charles L Guy, Lanfang H Levine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Features of Photosynthesis inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Effect of COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Translational regulation contributes to the elevated COThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatma KaplanCenter for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-ARS), Gainesville, Florida, USA. fkaplan@ufl.edu
Wei Zhao
Jeffrey T Richards
Raymond M Wheeler
Charles L Guy
Lanfang H Levine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn tightly closed human habitats such as space stations, locations near volcano vents and closed culture vessels, atmospheric CO(2) concentration may be 10 to 20 times greater than Earth's current ambient levels. It is known that super-elevated (SE) CO(2) (>1,200 µmol mol(-1)) induces physiological responses different from that of moderately elevated CO(2) (up to 1,200 µmol mol(-1)), but little is known about the molecular responses of plants to supra-optimal [CO(2)]. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTo understand the underlying molecular causes for differential physiological responses, metabolite and transcript profiles were analyzed in aerial tissue of Arabidopsis plants, which were grown under ambient atmospheric CO(2) (400 µmol mol(-1)), elevated CO(2) (1,200 µmol mol(-1)) and SE CO(2) (4,000 µmol mol(-1)), at two developmental stages early and late vegetative stage. Transcript and metabolite profiling revealed very different responses to elevated versus SE [CO(2)]. The transcript profiles of SE CO(2) treated plants were closer to that of the control. Development stage had a clear effect on plant molecular response to elevated and SE [CO(2)]. Photosynthetic acclimation in terms of down-regulation of photosynthetic gene expression was observed in response to elevated [CO(2)], but not that of SE [CO(2)] providing the first molecular evidence that there appears to be a fundamental disparity in the way plants respond to elevated and SE [CO(2)]. Although starch accumulation was induced by both elevated and SE [CO(2)], the increase was less at the late vegetative stage and accompanied by higher soluble sugar content suggesting an increased starch breakdown to meet sink strength resulting from the rapid growth demand. Furthermore, many of the elevated and SE CO(2)-responsive genes found in the present study are also regulated by plant hormone and stress. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides new insights into plant acclimation to elevated and SE [CO(2)] during development and how this relates to stress, sugar and hormone signaling.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCarbon DioxideGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhotosynthesisCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID22916280
PMCPMC3423350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.