ArticlePloS one2012
Evaluating the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) as a candidate dinoflagellate barcode marker.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial and Nuclear Markers Reveal Contrasting Patterns of Genetic Diversity in the Red Palm Weevil (Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Oleaginous Heterotrophic Dinoflagellates-Crypthecodiniaceae.Marine drugs · 2023Article
- Development of a rapid detection method forFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Using RDNA sequences to define dinoflagellate species.PloS one · 2022Article
- q-PCR-based assay for the toxic dinoflagellate Karenia selliformis monitoring along the Tunisian coasts.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Resolving cryptic species complexes in marine protists: phylogenetic haplotype networks meet global DNA metabarcoding datasets.The ISME journal · 2021Article
- The Application of Nanopore Sequencing Technology to the Study of Dinoflagellates: A Proof of Concept Study for Rapid Sequence-Based Discrimination of Potentially Harmful Algae.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- The diversity of ice algal communities on the Greenland Ice Sheet as revealed by oligotyping.Microbial genomics · 2018Article
- Host specificity of Symbiodinium variants revealed by an ITS2 metahaplotype approach.The ISME journal · 2017Article
- Cryptic infection of a broad taxonomic and geographic diversity of tadpoles by Perkinsea protists.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Article
- Intra-genomic variation in symbiotic dinoflagellates: recent divergence or recombination between lineages?BMC evolutionary biology · 2015Article
- Testing ecological theories with sequence similarity networks: marine ciliates exhibit similar geographic dispersal patterns as multicellular organisms.BMC biology · 2015Article
- An Improved DNA Extraction Method for Efficient and Quantitative Recovery of Phytoplankton Diversity in Natural Assemblages.PloS one · 2015Article
- Article
- An Updated List of Generic Names in the Thoracosphaeraceae.Microorganisms · 2013Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA barcoding offers an efficient way to determine species identification and to measure biodiversity. For dinoflagellates, an ancient alveolate group of about 2000 described extant species, DNA barcoding studies have revealed large amounts of unrecognized species diversity, most of which is not represented in culture collections. To date, two mitochondrial gene markers, Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) and Cytochrome b oxidase (COB), have been used to assess DNA barcoding in dinoflagellates, and both failed to amplify all taxa and suffered from low resolution. Nevertheless, both genes yielded many examples of morphospecies showing cryptic speciation and morphologically distinct named species being genetically similar, highlighting the need for a common marker. For example, a large number of cultured Symbiodinium strains have neither taxonomic identification, nor a common measure of diversity that can be used to compare this genus to other dinoflagellates. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the Internal Transcribed Spacer units 1 and 2 (ITS) of the rDNA operon, as a high resolution marker for distinguishing species dinoflagellates in culture. In our study, from 78 different species, the ITS barcode clearly differentiated species from genera and could identify 96% of strains to a known species or sub-genus grouping. 8.3% showed evidence of being cryptic species. A quarter of strains identified had no previous species identification. The greatest levels of hidden biodiversity came from Scrippsiella and the Pfiesteriaceae family, whilst Heterocapsa strains showed a high level of mismatch to their given species name. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The ITS marker was successful in confirming species, revealing hidden diversity in culture collections. This marker, however, may have limited use for environmental barcoding due to paralogues, the potential for unidentifiable chimaeras and priming across taxa. In these cases ITS would serve well in combination with other markers or for specific taxon studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.