ArticlePloS one2012
Use of national and international growth charts for studying height in European children: development of up-to-date European height-for-age charts.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of international growth charts to assess nutritional status in children and adolescents: a systematic review.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical practice recommendations for growth hormone treatment in children with chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2019Guideline
- Short Stature: Comparison of WHO and National Growth Standards/References for Height.PloS one · 2016Trial
- Phenotypic Spectrum of HNF4α-Associated Fanconi Renotubular Syndrome.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Use of WHO Growth Standards Rather Than Locally Specific Linear Growth Curves Promotes Equity in Pediatric Growth Research for Children Younger Than 5 Years.Nutrition reviews · 2026Review
- New growth charts for children and adolescents in Catalonia, Spain: developed from routinely collected data (2013-2019).BMC public health · 2026Article
- Do Anthropometric Health Risk Indicators of South African Primary School Children Require National Growth Charts? Insights from the NW-CHILD Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Updated Swiss Growth References 2025: No Height Differences, but BMI Variations Associated with Migration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Factors associated with statural growth in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with focus on metabolic acidosis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Lipid Trajectories and Progression of CKD in Children.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Estimated annual increments in stature and weight among soccer players 11-18 years.Biology of sport · 2025Article
- Comparison of accuracy of different dental age estimation methods in Finnish and Turkish populations.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Reference data for body composition parameters in normal-weight Polish adolescents: results from the population-based ADOPOLNOR study.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Anthropometric indices growth references (length, Weight and Head Circumferences) of children aged 0-24 months in North-East of Iran by GAMLSS.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Dyslipidemia in children with chronic kidney disease-findings from the Cardiovascular Comorbidity in Children with Chronic Kidney Disease (4C) study.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- The International X-Linked Hypophosphatemia (XLH) Registry: first interim analysis of baseline demographic, genetic and clinical data.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Age and body mass index affect fit of spirometry Global Lung Function Initiative references in schoolchildren.ERJ open research · 2022Article
- Growth in Exclusively Breastfed and Non-exclusively Breastfed Children: Comparisons with WHO Child Growth Standards and Korean National Growth Charts.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- The legacy of a standard of normality in child nutrition research.SSM - population health · 2021Article
- New Growth Curves for Spanish Children (0-10 Years) in the Region of Extremadura.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGrowth charts based on data collected in different populations and time periods are key tools to assess children's linear growth. We analyzed the impact of geographic factors and the secular trend on height-for-age charts currently used in European populations, developed up-to-date European growth charts, and studied the effect of using different charts in a sample of growth retarded children. METHODS AND
findingsIn an international survey we obtained 18 unique national height-for-age charts from 28 European countries and compared them with charts from the World Health Organization (WHO), Euro-Growth reference, and Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). As an example, we obtained height data from 3,534 children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) from 13 countries via the ESPN/ERA-EDTA registry, a patient group generally suffering from growth retardation. National growth charts showed a clear secular trend in height (mean height increased on average 0.6 cm/decade) and a North-South height gradient in Europe. For countries without a recent (>1990) national growth chart novel European growth charts were constructed from Northern and Southern European reference populations, reflecting geographic height differences in mean final height of 3.9 cm in boys and 3.8 cm in girls. Mean height SDS of 2- to 17-year-old ESRD patients calculated from recent national or derived European growth charts (-1.91, 95% CI: -1.97 to -1.85) was significantly lower than when using CDC or WHO growth charts (-1.55, 95% CI: -1.61 to -1.49) (P<0.0001).
conclusionDifferences between height-for-age charts may reflect true population differences, but are also strongly affected by the secular trend in height. The choice of reference charts substantially affects the clinical decision whether a child is considered short-for-age. Therefore, we advocate using recent national or European height-for-age charts derived from recent national data when monitoring growth of healthy and diseased European children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.