ArticlePatient related outcome measures2010
Patient outcome in migraine prophylaxis: the role of psychopharmacological agents.
Article in Patient related outcome measures, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- A prospective, open-label study of milnacipran in the prevention of headache in patients with episodic or chronic migraine.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2014Trial
- Job Satisfaction Mediates the Association between Perceived Disability and Work Productivity in Migraine Headache Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Recent Approaches and Development of Acupuncture on Chronic Daily Headache.Current pain and headache reports · 2016Review
- Prevalence of migraine and co-morbid psychiatric disorders among students of Cumhuriyet University.The journal of headache and pain · 2013Article
- Alexithymia and its impact on quality of life in a group of Brazilian women with migraine without aura.The journal of headache and pain · 2013Article
- The psychometric properties of the persian migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire version 2.1 in episodic and chronic migraines.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2013Article
- White matter hyperintensities and self-reported depression in a sample of patients with chronic headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2012Article
- Hearing voices: does it give your patient a headache? A case of auditory hallucinations as acoustic aura in migraine.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2012Article
- Chronic migraine: comorbidities, risk factors, and rehabilitation.Internal and emergency medicine · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMigraine is a serious illness that needs correct treatment for acute attacks and, in addition, a treatment prophylaxis, since patients with migraine suffer during acute attacks and also between attacks.
methodsA systematic review of the most relevant clinical trials of migraine headache and its epidemiology, pathophysiology, comorbidity, and prophylactic treatment (medical and nonmedical) was carried out using "Medline" and "PsychINFO" from 1973 to 2009. Approximately 110 trials met our inclusion criteria and were included in the current review.
resultsThe most effective pharmacological treatment for migraine prophylaxis is propranolol and anticonvulsants such as topiramate, valproic acid, and amitriptyline. Nonmedical treatments such as acupuncture, biofeedback, and melatonin have also been proposed. Peripheral neurostimulation has been suggested for the treatment of chronic daily headache that does not respond to prophylaxis and for the treatment of drug-resistant primary headache. The majority of the pharmacological agents available today have limited efficacy and may cause adverse effects incompatible with long-term use. LIMITATIONS: The review was limited by the highly variable and often insufficient reporting of the complex outcome data and by the fact that migraine prophylaxis trials typically use headache diaries to monitor the course of the disease. The results of the different studies were also presented in different ways, making comparison of the results difficult. DISCUSSION: An adequate prophylaxis is crucial in reducing disability and preventing the evolution of the problem into a chronic progressive illness. The implications of the present findings were discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.