ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2011
Validation of the BPLab(®) 24-hour blood pressure monitoring system according to the European standard BS EN 1060-4:2004 and British Hypertension Society protocol.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ambulatory monitoring of central arterial pressure, wave reflections, and arterial stiffness in patients at cardiovascular risk.Journal of human hypertension · 2022Review
- Relationship of choroidal thickness with pulsatile hemodynamics in essential hypertensive patients.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021Article
- Ambulatory blood pressure and arterial stiffness web-based telemonitoring in patients at cardiovascular risk. First results of the VASOTENS (Vascular health ASsessment Of The hypertENSive patients) Registry.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Observational
- Relationships between 24-h blood pressure variability and 24-h central arterial pressure, pulse wave velocity and augmentation index in hypertensive patients.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2017Article
- Twenty-Four-Hour Ambulatory Pulse Wave Analysis in Hypertension Management: Current Evidence and Perspectives.Current hypertension reports · 2016Review
- Vascular Health Assessment of The Hypertensive Patients (VASOTENS) Registry: Study Protocol of an International, Web-Based Telemonitoring Registry for Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness.JMIR research protocols · 2016Article
- Tendency for age-specific mortality with hypertension in the European Union from 1980 to 2011.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- Validation of the BPLab(®) 24-hour blood pressure monitoring system in a pediatric population according to the 1993 British Hypertension Society protocol.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2015Article
- Evaluation of 24-Hour Arterial Stiffness Indices and Central Hemodynamics in Healthy Normotensive Subjects versus Treated or Untreated Hypertensive Patients: A Feasibility Study.International journal of hypertension · 2015Article
- Comparison of the BPLab® sphygmomanometer for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with mercury sphygmomanometry in pregnant women: validation study according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.Vascular health and risk management · 2015Article
- Day-to-day repeatability of the Pulse Time Index of Norm.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2014Article
- Validation of the integration of technology that measures additional "vascular" indices into an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring system.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2014Article
- The 24-hour pulse wave velocity, aortic augmentation index, and central blood pressure in normotensive volunteers.Vascular health and risk management · 2014Article
- The "Pulse Time Index of Norm" highly correlates with the left ventricular mass index in patients with arterial hypertension.Vascular health and risk management · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-03-14Error in Data · Error in Methods · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAutomatic blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are more and more often used in BP self-checks and in 24-hour BP monitoring. Nowadays, 24-hour BP monitoring is a necessary procedure in arterial hypertension treatment. The aim of this study was to validate the BPLab(®) ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the European standard BS EN 1060-4:2004 and the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol, as well as to work out solutions regarding the suitability of using this device in clinical practice.
methodsA group of 85 patients of both sexes and different ages, who voluntarily agreed to take part in the tests and were given detailed instructions on the measurement technique were recruited for this study. The results of the BP measurement obtained by a qualified operator using the BPLab(®) device were compared with the BP values measured using the Korotkov auscultatory method. Data were obtained simultaneously by two experts with experience of over 10 years and had completed a noninvasive BP measurement standardization training course. Discrepancies in the systolic and diastolic BP measurements (N = 510; 255 for each expert) were analyzed according to the criteria specified in the BHS-93 protocol.
resultsThe device passed the requirements of the European Standard BS EN 1060-4:2004 and was graded 'A' according to the criteria of the BHS protocol for both systolic BP and diastolic BP.
conclusionThe BPLab(®) 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device may be recommended for extensive clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.