Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22915809›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2012

Regulated interaction of tegument proteins UL16 and UL11 from herpes simplex virus.

Pooja Chadha, Jun Han, Jason L Starkey, John W Wills

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Assembly and Egress of an Alphaherpesvirus Clockwork.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pooja ChadhaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jun Han
Jason L Starkey
John W Wills
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Molecular Functions and Mechanisms of UL16, A Conserved Tegument Protein of HSVR01AI071286 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI WILLS, JOHN W. · 2007 to 2016
$5.1M
VIRUSES AND CANCERT32CA060395 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI MEYERS, CRAIG M · 1994 to 2021
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA060395NCI NIH HHS T32 CA60395NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI071286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that proteins in the tegument (located between the viral capsid and envelope proteins) play critical roles in the assembly and budding of herpesviruses. Tegument proteins UL16 and UL11 of herpes simplex virus (HSV) are conserved among all the Herpesviridae. Although these proteins directly interact in vitro, UL16 was found to colocalize poorly with UL11 in cotransfected cells. To explain this discrepancy, we hypothesized that UL16 is initially made in an inactive form and is artificially transformed to the binding-competent state when cells are disrupted. Consistent with a regulated interaction, UL16 was able to fully colocalize with UL11 when a large C-terminal segment of UL16 was removed, creating mutant UL16(1-155). Moreover, membrane flotation assays revealed a massive movement of this mutant to the top of sucrose gradients in the presence of UL11, whereas both the full-length UL16 and the C-terminal fragment (residues 156 to 373) remained at the bottom. Further evidence for the presence of a C-terminal regulatory domain was provided by single-amino-acid substitutions at conserved cysteines (C269S, C271S, and C357S), which enabled the efficient interaction of full-length UL16 with UL11. Lastly, the binding site for UL11 was further mapped to residues 81 to 155, and to our surprise, the 5 Cys residues within UL16(1-155) are not required, even though the modification of free cysteines in UL16 with N-ethylmaleimide does in fact prevent binding. Collectively, these results reveal a regulatory function within the C-terminal region of UL16 that controls an N-terminal UL11-binding activity.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MappingVirus AssemblyAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsBinding SitesChlorocebus aethiopsMutant ProteinsProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsSequence DeletionSimplexvirusVero CellsViral Structural ProteinsMutant ProteinsUL11 protein, herpesviridaeViral Structural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22915809
PMCPMC3486286
OpenAlexW2022667827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.