Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22915730›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2012

Effect of assertive outreach after suicide attempt in the AID (assertive intervention for deliberate self harm) trial: randomised controlled trial.

Britt Morthorst, Jesper Krogh, Annette Erlangsen, Francisco Alberdi, Merete Nordentoft

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00700089 phase4completednot on this map

AID-trial:A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Effect on Repeated Self-harm of Assertive Intervention and Standard Treatment After Deliberate Self-harm

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2007 to 2011Enrolled243ConditionsSuicide, AttemptedArmsAssertive intervention, Standard treatment
NCT03444935 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Phone Call Follow-up After Crisis Centre Presentation With Suicidal Ideation and Behaviours.

TypeinterventionalSponsorWinnipeg Regional Health AuthorityRan2018 to 2025Enrolled83ConditionsSuicide, Suicidal Ideation, Suicide, Attempted, Suicide GestureArmsFollow-up phone call
NCT03489382 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The BEACON Study: Protocol for Cluster RCT of a Service to Deliver Smartphone-Assisted Problem-Solving Therapy Compared to Usual Care in Men Who Present With Intentional Self-Harm to the ED in Ontario (Protocol A)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2020 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsIntentional Self-Harm, SuicideArmsSmartphone Assisted PST
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Reducing self-harm in adolescents: the RISA-IPD comprehensive synopsis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Intensive case management for severe mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Case management for suicide prevention: a rapid review and evidence map.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Suicide Models and Treatment Models Are Separate Entities. What Does It Mean for Clinical Suicide Prevention?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Britt MorthorstResearch Unit, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark. .morthorst@regionh.dk
Jesper Krogh
Annette Erlangsen
Francisco Alberdi
Merete Nordentoft
Bispebjerg Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether an assertive outreach intervention after suicide attempt could reduce the frequency of subsequent suicidal acts, compared with standard treatment.

designRandomised, parallel group, superiority trial with blinded outcome assessment.

settingOutpatient intervention at one location at Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.

participantsPatients older than 12 years admitted to regional hospitals in Copenhagen with a suicide attempt within the past 14 days. We excluded patients diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and patients living in institutions.

interventionCase management through assertive outreach that provided crisis intervention and flexible problem solving. This approach incorporated motivational support and actively assisted patients to scheduled appointments to improve adherence with after-treatment as an add on to standard treatment. MAIN OUTCOME: Repeated suicide attempt and death by suicide, recorded in medical records and death register at 1-year follow-up.

results243 patients were included. During 12 months of follow-up, 20/123 (16%) patients in the intervention group had been registered in hospital records with subsequent suicide attempt, compared with 13/120 (11%) in the control group (odds ratio 1.60, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 3.38; P=0.22). By contrast, self reported data on new events showed 11/95 (12%) in the intervention group versus 13/74 (18%) in the control group (0.61, 0.26 to 1.46; P=0.27). By imputing missing data on the selfreported outcomes, we estimated 15/123 (12%) events in the intervention group and 23/120 (19%) in the control group (0.69, 0.34 to 1.43; P=0.32).

conclusionAssertive outreach showed no significant effect on subsequent suicide attempt. The difference in rates of events between register data and self reported data could indicate detection bias.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00700089.

Indexed as

Case ManagementAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildCrisis InterventionDenmarkFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceRegistriesSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID22915730
PMCPMC3425442
OpenAlexW2074874714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.