Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22915658›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2012

Epigenetic therapy using belinostat for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter phase I/II study with biomarker and pharmacokinetic analysis of tumors from patients in the Mayo Phase II Consortium and the Cancer Therapeutics Research Group.

Winnie Yeo, Hyun C Chung, Stephen L Chan, Ling Z Wang, Robert Lim, Joel Picus, Michael Boyer, Frankie K F Mo, Jane Koh, Sun Y Rha and 12 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Hepatocellular carcinoma: signaling pathways and therapeutic advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. FBXO family genes promotes hepatocellular carcinoma via ubiquitination of p53.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Winnie YeoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, State Key Lab of Oncology in South China, Prince of Wales Hospital Shatin, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. winnieyeo@cuhk.edu.hk
Hyun C Chung
Stephen L Chan
Ling Z Wang
Robert Lim
Joel Picus
Michael Boyer
Frankie K F Mo
Jane Koh
Sun Y Rha
Edwin P Hui
Hei C Jeung
Jae K Roh
Simon C H Yu
Ka F To
Qian Tao
Brigette B Ma
Anthony W H Chan
Joanna H M Tong
Charles Erlichman
Anthony T C Chan
Boon C Goh

Funding

NCI NIH HHS N01 CM062205NCI NIH HHS N01-CM62205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEpigenetic aberrations have been reported in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study of patients with unresectable HCC and chronic liver disease, epigenetic therapy with the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat was assessed. The objectives were to determine dose-limiting toxicity and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), to assess pharmacokinetics in phase I, and to assess activity of and explore potential biomarkers for response in phase II. PATIENTS AND

methodsMajor eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed unresectable HCC, European Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ≤ 2, and adequate organ function. Phase I consisted of 18 patients; belinostat was given intravenously once per day on days 1 to 5 every 3 weeks; dose levels were 600 mg/m(2) per day (level 1), 900 mg/m(2) per day (level 2), 1,200 mg/m(2) per day (level 3), and 1,400 mg/m(2) per day (level 4). Phase II consisted of 42 patients. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and the main secondary end points were response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analysis was conducted on pretreatment tumor tissues to determine whether HR23B expression is a potential biomarker for response.

resultsBelinostat pharmacokinetics were linear from 600 to 1,400 mg/m(2) without significant accumulation. The MTD was not reached at the maximum dose administered. Dose level 4 was used in phase II. The median number of cycles was two (range, one to 12). The partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) rates were 2.4% and 45.2%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 2.64 and 6.60 months, respectively. Exploratory analysis revealed that disease stabilization rate (complete response plus PR plus SD) in tumors having high and low HR23B histoscores were 58% and 14%, respectively (P = .036).

conclusionEpigenetic therapy with belinostat demonstrates tumor stabilization and is generally well-tolerated. HR23B expression was associated with disease stabilization.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, PharmacologicalCarcinoma, HepatocellularComorbidityDisease-Free SurvivalDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesEpigenomicsFemaleHepatitis B, ChronicHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansHydroxamic AcidsLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsbelinostatBiomarkers, PharmacologicalDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsRAD23B protein, humanSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID22915658
PMCPMC3438233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.