Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22914755›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association2012

Postnatal unit bassinet types when rooming-in after cesarean birth: implications for breastfeeding and infant safety.

Kristin P Tully, Helen L Ball

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06533449 (Development of the Couplet Care Bassinet to Support Safe Implementation of Skin-to-skin Contact and rooming-in on Postnatal Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06533449 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development of the Couplet Care Bassinet to Support Safe Implementation of Skin-to-skin Contact and rooming-in on Postnatal Units

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled160ConditionsBreastfeeding, Sleep, Patient SatisfactionArmsCouplet Care Bassinet, Standard Bassinet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Australian Women's Experiences of Establishing Breastfeeding after Caesarean Birth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristin P TullyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. kristin.tully@unc.edu
Helen L Ball
Durham University · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Human Development: Interdisiplinary Research TrainingT32HD007376 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BELGER, AYSENIL, PROPPER, CATHI BARBRA · 1988 to 2020
$8.0M
NICHD NIH HHS 2T32HD007376-21A1NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostnatal unit rooming-in promotes breastfeeding. Previous research indicates that side-cars (3-sided bassinets that lock onto the maternal bed frame) facilitate breastfeeding after vaginal birth more than stand-alone bassinets (standard rooming-in). No study has previously investigated side-car bassinet use after cesarean, despite the constraints on maternal-infant interactions that are inherent in recovery from this birth mode.

objectiveTo test the effect of the side-car bassinet on postnatal unit breastfeeding frequency and other maternal-infant behaviors compared to a stand-alone bassinet following cesarean birth.

methodsParticipants were recruited and prenatally randomized to receive the side-car or stand-alone bassinet for their postnatal unit stay between January 2007 and March 2009 in northeastern England. Mother-infant interactions were filmed over the second postpartum night. Participants completed face-to-face interviews before and after filming. The main outcome measures were infant location, bassinet acceptability, and breastfeeding frequency. Other outcomes assessed were breastfeeding effort, maternal-infant contact, sleep states, midwife presence, and infant risk.

resultsDifferences in breastfeeding frequency, maternal-infant sleep overlap, and midwife presence were not statistically significant. The 20 dyads allocated to side-car bassinets breastfed a median of 0.6 bouts/ hour compared to 0.4 bouts/hour for the 15 stand-alone bassinet dyads. Participants expressed overwhelming preference for the side-car bassinets. Bed sharing was equivalent between the groups, although the motivation for this practice may have differed. Infant handling was compromised with stand-alone bassinet use, including infants positioned on pillows while bed sharing with their sleeping mothers.

conclusionsWomen preferred the side-car, but differences in breastfeeding frequency were not statistically significant. More infant risks were observed with stand-alone bassinet use.

Indexed as

BedsBreast FeedingCesarean SectionMother-Child RelationsPatient SafetyAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMalePatient SatisfactionPregnancyRooming-in CareSleepVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID22914755
PMCPMC3746007
OpenAlexW2006923860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.