Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22914469›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2012

A sustained decline in postmenopausal hormone use: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2010.

Brian L Sprague, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Kathleen A Cronin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brazilian Guideline on Menopausal Cardiovascular Health - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Hormone Replacement Therapy and Risk of Breast Cancer in Korean Women: A Quantitative Systematic Review.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Pharmacokinetic studies of solubilized estradiol given vaginally in a novel softgel capsule.Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society · 2016
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Social Media and Supplements for Menopausal Symptoms: A Content Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Then and Now: What We Have Learned From the WHI.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian L SpragueDepartment of Surgery and Office of Health Promotion Research, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA. brian.sprague@uvm.edu
Amy Trentham-Dietz
Kathleen A Cronin

Funding

Comparative Modeling: Informing Breast Cancer Control Practice & PolicyU01CA152958 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BERRY, DONALD A, DE KONING, HARRY J · 2010 to 2015
$7.6M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveShort-term declines in postmenopausal hormone use were observed after the Women's Health Initiative trial results in 2002. Although concerns about the trial's generalizability have been expressed, long-term trends in hormone use in a nationally representative sample have not been reported. We sought to evaluate national trends in the prevalence of hormone use and to assess variation by type of formulation and patient characteristics.

methodsWe examined postmenopausal hormone use during 1999-2010 using cross-sectional data from 10,107 women aged 40 years and older in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

resultsIn 1999-2000, the prevalence of oral postmenopausal hormone use was 22.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.0-25.8) overall, 13.3% (95% CI 11.0-15.5) for estrogen only, and 8.3% (95% CI 6.2-10.4) for estrogen plus progestin. A sharp decline in use of all formulations occurred in 2003-2004, when the overall prevalence decreased to 11.9% (95% CI 9.6-14.2). This decline was initially limited to non-Hispanic whites; use among non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics did not decline substantially until 2005-2006. Hormone use continued to decline through 2009-2010 across all patient demographic groups, with the current prevalence now at 4.7% (95% CI 3.3-6.1) overall, 2.7% (95% CI 1.9-3.4) for estrogen only, and 1.7% (95% CI 0.7-2.7) for estrogen plus progestin. Patient characteristics currently associated with hormone use include history of hysterectomy, non-Hispanic white race or ethnicity, and income.

conclusionPostmenopausal hormone use in the United States has declined in a sustained fashion to low levels across a wide variety of patient subgroups.

Indexed as

EstrogensProgestinsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDrug UtilizationEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesEstrogensProgestins

Identifiers

PMID22914469
PMCPMC3607288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.