Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22914366›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2012

Pilot phase IB clinical trial of an alhydrogel-adsorbed recombinant ricin vaccine.

Ellen S Vitetta, Joan E Smallshaw, John Schindler

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Recent advances in the development of vaccines against ricin.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ellen S VitettaCancer Immunobiology Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, USA. ellen.vitetta@utsouthwestern.edu
Joan E Smallshaw
John Schindler

Funding

PHS HHS R01-A1-070236PHS HHS R01-FDAD003369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no FDA-approved vaccine for the potent plant toxin ricin. We have developed a recombinant ricin vaccine, RiVax. Without adjuvant it is safe and immunogenic in mice, rabbits, and humans. Based on our studies in mice, we now report the results of a small clinical trial with Alhydrogel-adsorbed RiVax.

Indexed as

Pilot ProjectsVaccinesAdsorptionAdultAluminum HydroxideAntibodiesAntibody FormationFemaleHumansMaleRicinVaccines, SyntheticYoung AdultAluminum HydroxideAntibodiesRicinRiVaxVaccinesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID22914366
PMCPMC3485895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.