Trial reportBMC family practice2012
Improvement of primary health care of patients with poorly regulated diabetes mellitus type 2 using shared decision-making--the DEBATE trial.
Trial report in BMC family practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03453970 (Effectiveness of a Diabetes Education Program Based on Tailored Interventions in the Andalusian Public Health and Social System), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of a Diabetes Education Program Based on Tailored Interventions in the Andalusian Public Health and Social System (Edep-Ti Study).
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) in intervention studies-A systematic review.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- HbA1c as a shared treatment goal in type 2 diabetes? A secondary analysis of the DEBATE trial.BMC primary care · 2023Trial
- Shared decision making and patient-centeredness for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care-results of the cluster-randomised controlled DEBATE trial.BMC family practice · 2021Trial
- Patient-centered communication and shared decision making to reduce HbA1c levels of patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus - results of the cluster-randomized controlled DEBATE trial.BMC family practice · 2019Trial
- A shared decision-making approach to individualized exercise management enhances glycemic control, self-care behaviors, and quality of life in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Glycemic control and association with diabetes-related distress, self-management behavior, financial toxicity, and cost-related non-adherence: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Development of a shared decision-making intervention to improve drug safety and to reduce polypharmacy in frail elderly patients living at home.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- Glycaemic control for people with type 2 diabetes in Saudi Arabia - an urgent need for a review of management plan.BMC endocrine disorders · 2018Article
- Understanding the physical, social, and emotional experiences of people with uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince 2004, a national Disease Management Program (DMP) has been implemented in Germany, which includes educational measures aimed at patients with type-2 diabetes (T2D). However, about 15-20% of T2D patients remain in poor metabolic control. Qualitative research shows that one reason for this might be an increasing frustration of general practitioners (GPs) with the management of their poorly regulated T2D patients over time. We aim at approaching this problem by improving the GP-patient-communication and fostering shared decision-making. METHODS/
designAn educative intervention will be tested within a multi-centred cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Germany. We include 20 GPs in three regions. Each of the 60 GPs will recruit about 13 patients meeting the inclusion criteria (total of 780 patients). GPs allocated to the intervention group will receive a peer-visit from a specifically trained GP-colleague who will motivate them to apply patient-centred communication techniques including patient-centred decision aids. GPs allocated to the control group will not take part in any intervention program, but will provide care as usual to their patients. The primary inclusion criterion for patients at the time of the recruitment is an HbA1c-level of over 8.0. Primary outcome is the change of HbA1c at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months compared to HbA1c at baseline. Secondary outcomes include patient's participation in the process of shared decision-making and quality of life. DISCUSSION: If this intervention proves to be effective it may be integrated into the existing Disease Management Program for T2D in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.