Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22911737›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Comparative transcriptomics of the saprobic and parasitic growth phases in Coccidioides spp.

Emily Whiston, Hua Zhang Wise, Thomas J Sharpton, Ginger Jui, Garry T Cole, John W Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Evaluation of Different Gene Prediction Tools inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Coccidioides Species: A Review of Basic Research: 2022.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Characterization of the Growth and Morphology of a BSL-2Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily WhistonDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America. whiston@berkeley.edu
Hua Zhang Wise
Thomas J Sharpton
Ginger Jui
Garry T Cole
John W Taylor
University of California, Berkeley · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Vaccines and Diagnostics TrialsU54AI065359 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARBOUR, ALAN G. · 2005 to 2013
$88.8M
Coccidioidomycosis:Genome Comparison, Selection and Transcription.R01AI070891 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI TAYLOR, JOHN W. · 2007 to 2011
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI070891NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI070891NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI065359NIAID NIH HHS U54-AI65359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coccidioides immitis and C. posadasii, the causative agents of coccidioidomycosis, are dimorphic fungal pathogens, which grow as hyphae in the saprobic phase in the environment and as spherules in the parasitic phase in the mammalian host. In this study, we use comparative transcriptomics to identify gene expression differences between the saprobic and parasitic growth phases. We prepared Illumina mRNA sequencing libraries for saprobic-phase hyphae and parasitic-phase spherules in vitro for C. immitis isolate RS and C. posadasii isolate C735 in biological triplicate. Of 9,910 total predicted genes in Coccidioides, we observed 1,298 genes up-regulated in the saprobic phase of both C. immitis and C. posadasii and 1,880 genes up-regulated in the parasitic phase of both species. Comparing the saprobic and parasitic growth phases, we observed considerable differential expression of cell surface-associated genes, particularly chitin-related genes. We also observed differential expression of several virulence factors previously identified in Coccidioides and other dimorphic fungal pathogens. These included alpha (1,3) glucan synthase, SOWgp, and several genes in the urease pathway. Furthermore, we observed differential expression in many genes predicted to be under positive selection in two recent Coccidioides comparative genomics studies. These results highlight a number of genes that may be crucial to dimorphic phase-switching and virulence in Coccidioides. These observations will impact priorities for future genetics-based studies in Coccidioides and provide context for studies in other fungal pathogens.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalTranscriptomeCoccidioidesGene Expression ProfilingVirulence FactorsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID22911737
PMCPMC3401177
OpenAlexW2094511280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.