ArticlePloS one2012
Bottom-up engineering of biological systems through standard bricks: a modularity study on basic parts and devices.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Context-dependency of synthetic minimal promoters in driving gene expression: a case study.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
- New Applications of Synthetic Biology Tools for Cyanobacterial Metabolic Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Utilization of rare codon-rich markers for screening amino acid overproducers.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Strategies for manipulation of oxygen utilization by the electron transfer chain in microbes for metabolic engineering purposes.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2017Review
- Cellular factories for coenzyme QMicrobial cell factories · 2017Review
- Re-using biological devices: a model-aided analysis of interconnected transcriptional cascades designed from the bottom-up.Journal of biological engineering · 2017Article
- Dealing with the genetic load in bacterial synthetic biology circuits: convergences with the Ohm's law.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Quantification of the gene silencing performances of rationally-designed synthetic small RNAs.Systems and synthetic biology · 2015Article
- Standards not that standard.Journal of biological engineering · 2015Article
- Multi-Faceted Characterization of a Novel LuxR-Repressible Promoter Library for Escherichia coli.PloS one · 2015Article
- Modelling the effects of cell-to-cell variability on the output of interconnected gene networks in bacterial populations.BMC systems biology · 2015Article
- Half-life measurements of chemical inducers for recombinant gene expression.Journal of biological engineering · 2014Article
- High-throughput, cost-effective verification of structural DNA assembly.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Advances and computational tools towards predictable design in biological engineering.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2014Review
- A standard vector for the chromosomal integration and characterization of BioBrick™ parts in Escherichia coli.Journal of biological engineering · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModularity is a crucial issue in the engineering world, as it enables engineers to achieve predictable outcomes when different components are interconnected. Synthetic Biology aims to apply key concepts of engineering to design and construct new biological systems that exhibit a predictable behaviour. Even if physical and measurement standards have been recently proposed to facilitate the assembly and characterization of biological components, real modularity is still a major research issue. The success of the bottom-up approach strictly depends on the clear definition of the limits in which biological functions can be predictable.
resultsThe modularity of transcription-based biological components has been investigated in several conditions. First, the activity of a set of promoters was quantified in Escherichia coli via different measurement systems (i.e., different plasmids, reporter genes, ribosome binding sites) relative to an in vivo reference promoter. Second, promoter activity variation was measured when two independent gene expression cassettes were assembled in the same system. Third, the interchangeability of input modules (a set of constitutive promoters and two regulated promoters) connected to a fixed output device (a logic inverter) expressing GFP was evaluated. The three input modules provide tunable transcriptional signals that drive the output device. If modularity persists, identical transcriptional signals trigger identical GFP outputs. To verify this, all the input devices were individually characterized and then the input-output characteristic of the logic inverter was derived in the different configurations.
conclusionsPromoters activities (referred to a standard promoter) can vary when they are measured via different reporter devices (up to 22%), when they are used within a two-expression-cassette system (up to 35%) and when they drive another device in a functionally interconnected circuit (up to 44%). This paper provides a significant contribution to the study of modularity limitations in building biological systems by providing useful data on context-dependent variability of biological components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.