Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22911111›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2012

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) profiles--validated risk predictors for progression to oral cancer.

Lewei Zhang, Catherine F Poh, Michele Williams, Denise M Laronde, Ken Berean, Pamela J Gardner, Huijun Jiang, Lang Wu, J Jack Lee, Miriam P Rosin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Features Associated With Malignant Transformation of Low-Grade Dysplasia.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lewei ZhangCancer Control Research Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Catherine F Poh
Michele Williams
Denise M Laronde
Ken Berean
Pamela J Gardner
Huijun Jiang
Lang Wu
J Jack Lee
Miriam P Rosin

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting the p53 pathway for reversal of oral premalignancyP50CA097007 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MYERS, JEFFREY NICHOLAS · 2002 to 2012
$26.1M
CLONAL CHANGES IN ORAL LESIONS OF HIGH-RISK PATIENTSR01DE013124 · NIDCR · BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY · PI ROSIN, MIRIAM P. · 1999 to 2007
$2.1M
Optical Techniques and Oral Precancer ManagementR01DE017013 · NIDCR · BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY · PI ROSIN, MIRIAM P. · 2005 to 2009
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA097007NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097007NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013124NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017013NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE13124NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE17013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major barrier to oral cancer prevention has been the lack of validated risk predictors for oral premalignant lesions (OPL). In 2000, we proposed a loss of heterozygosity (LOH) risk model in a retrospective study. This paper validated the previously reported LOH profiles as risk predictors and developed refined models via the largest longitudinal study to date of low-grade OPLs from a population-based patient group. Analysis involved a prospective cohort of 296 patients with primary mild/moderate oral dysplasia enrolled in the Oral Cancer Prediction Longitudinal Study. LOH status was determined in these OPLs. Patients were classified into high-risk or low-risk profiles to validate the 2000 model. Risk models were refined using recursive partitioning and Cox regression analyses. The prospective cohort validated that the high-risk lesions (3p and/or 9p LOH) had a 22.6-fold increase in risk (P = 0.002) compared with low-risk lesions (3p and 9p retention). Addition of another 2 markers (loci on 4q/17p) further improved the risk prediction, with five-year progression rates of 3.1%, 16.3%, and 63.1% for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk lesions, respectively. Compared with the low-risk group, intermediate- and high-risk groups had 11.6-fold and 52.1-fold increase in risk (P < 0.001). LOH profiles as risk predictors in the refined model were validated in the retrospective cohort. Multicovariate analysis with clinical features showed LOH models to be the most significant predictors of progression. LOH profiles can reliably differentiate progression risk for OPLs. Potential uses include increasing surveillance for patients with elevated risk, improving target intervention for high-risk patients while sparing a large number of low-risk patients from needless screening and treatment.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLoss of HeterozygosityMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID22911111
PMCPMC3793638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.