Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22910876›Full record

ReviewPlanta2013

Divide and shape: an endosymbiont in action.

Kevin A Pyke

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fluorescent Labeling and Confocal Microcopy of Plastids and Stromules.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biogenesis and homeostasis of chloroplasts and other plastids.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin A PykePlant and Crop Sciences Division, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, UK. kevin.pyke@nottingham.ac.uk
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endosymbiotic evolution of the plastid within the host cell required development of a mechanism for efficient division of the plastid. Whilst a model for the mechanism of chloroplast division has been constructed, little is known of how other types of plastids divide, especially the proplastid, the progenitor of all plastid types in the cell. It has become clear that plastid shape is highly heterogeneous and dynamic, especially stromules. This article considers how such variation in morphology might be controlled and how such plastids might divide efficiently.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionOrganelle ShapeSymbiosisArabidopsisBiological EvolutionCell DifferentiationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIntracellular MembranesMeristemMesophyll CellsPlant CellsPlant ProteinsPlastidsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22910876
OpenAlexW2152202590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.